- From: Axel Nennker <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 04:34:21 -0700
- To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2016 11:34:48 UTC
I have not seen an argument in the discussion in [w3c/browser-payment-api#132](https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/132) that convinced me not to use the standard WebIDL. Arguments: Counter Argument 1. Tests are more difficult: I don't buy that because WebIDL dictionaries are simple 2. Payment experts don't understand WebIDL: Payment experts don't understand JSON-LD neither 3. "just use json schema": see 2 4. ... --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/133#issuecomment-222663098
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2016 11:34:48 UTC