W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > May 2016

Re: [w3c/webpayments] Should payment method specifications contain WebIDL? (#133)

From: Axel Nennker <notifications@github.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 04:34:21 -0700
To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
Cc:
Message-ID: <w3c/webpayments/issues/133/222663098@github.com>
I have not seen an argument in the discussion in [w3c/browser-payment-api#132](https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/132) that convinced me not to use the standard WebIDL.

Arguments: Counter Argument

1. Tests are more difficult: I don't buy that because WebIDL dictionaries are simple
2. Payment experts don't understand WebIDL: Payment experts don't understand JSON-LD neither
3. "just use json schema": see 2
4. ...






---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/133#issuecomment-222663098
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2016 11:34:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 31 May 2016 11:34:49 UTC