- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 21:51:58 -0500
- To: David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com>
- Cc: Payments WG <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2016 02:52:02 UTC
> On May 9, 2016, at 7:01 PM, David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> wrote: > > Hello all: > > I have a question. > Ian wrote: >> This seems like a good WG call question: whether the scope of its initial work >> will be web-based payment apps or (the subset) browser-based payment >> apps. > > What does "initial work" mean, exactly, in terms of documents and rec-track progress? Hi David, Part of the exercise of creating this document [1] has been to help us establish a shared understanding of terms and scope. AdrianHB asks a scope question in the payment apps wiki: does the WG want to focus on browser-based payment apps initially (that is: those that run in a JavaScript environment in the browser), or a broader class of web-based payment apps (which includes the browser-based apps but also HTTP services, for example). Presumably the WG could choose to limit a “v1” Recommendation to browser-based apps, then build from there. Or the WG could choose to work on the broader class in v1. Ian [1] https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/wiki/PaymentApp_Notes -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2016 02:52:02 UTC