W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > May 2016

Re: New repos for specs

From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 18:06:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+eFz_Kzwi2=1cgMsSmi4tuEKFZ0id7qUZ=PdpNH11vAsndnbQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matt Saxon <matt.saxon@gmail.com>
Cc: Payments WG <public-payments-wg@w3.org>, "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>, VIGNET cyril <Cyril.VIGNET@bpce.fr>
On 4 May 2016 at 15:42, Matt Saxon <matt.saxon@gmail.com> wrote:

> OK, as co-editor for it (with Cyril), I propose
> “webpayments-methods-credit-transfer-direct-debit”
>

+1


>
>
> I’ve left of the “basic” and I would expect to expand this document for
> more complex forms later, e.g. SCT INST (SEPA Instant Credit Transfer).
>
>
>
> This bring me to if we should have “basic-card” as a separate repo or just
> “card”, my view is it should be card and tokenisation etc. should be
> covered in the same repo, perhaps even the same doc.
>

+1 (and to change the title of the spec)


>
>
> Regards,
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> *From:* Adrian Hope-Bailie [mailto:adrian@hopebailie.com]
> *Sent:* 03 May 2016 19:23
> *To:* Matt Saxon
> *Cc:* Payments WG; Michael[tm] Smith
> *Subject:* Re: New repos for specs
>
>
>
> Sure, I'd recommend a name is proposed by the editors (and the same is
> done for future specs)
>
> On Tuesday, May 3, 2016, Matt Saxon <matt.saxon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Can we not name the sepa repo as you suggest, this covers more than just
> sepa.
>
> Let me have a closer look and suggest an appropriate name.
>
> Regards,
> Matt
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 3 May 2016, at 16:34, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The chairs have resolved to follow the pattern being adopted by other
> groups and use a new GitHub repo per spec.
> >
> > This will allow you to subscribe only to the repos you want to track.
> > We will still forward all repo update mails to the mailing list to
> accommodate those that are not on GitHub.
> >
> > Assuming we have no objections on Thursday's call we will move the basic
> card payment methods spec and payment method identifiers specs out of the
> browser API repo into their own repo and move the SEPA payment methods spec
> from the proposals into it's own repo.
> >
> > We are standardizing on a repo naming convention using the prefix
> "webpayments-" and will use "webpayments-method-" for any payment method
> specs.
> >
> > @Mike: Please can you create:
> >
> > w3c/webpayments-method-identifers
> > w3c/webpayments-methods-basic-card
> > w3c/webpayments-methods-sepa
> >
> > You can migrate the SEPA spec into it's repo before the call as the
> group already resolved to adopt this spec.
> >
> > Question: Would the group like to move the browser APi spec to:
> > w3c/webpayments-browser-api (or similar) or is this too much overhead
> and unnecessary?
> >
> > Adrian
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from a mobile device, please excuse any typos
>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> Virus-free.
> www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2016 16:15:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 4 May 2016 16:15:28 UTC