Thursday, 29 December 2016
Wednesday, 28 December 2016
Monday, 19 December 2016
Saturday, 17 December 2016
Friday, 16 December 2016
- [Minutes and Summary] 16 December Credit Transfer Payment Method Specification meeting
- Registration open [Was: Make travel plans now: WPWG face-to-face meeting 23-24 March in Chicago]
- Blog post: Web Payments Traction in 2016 and Looking Ahead
- wpwg-ACTION-42: Review the cg required list and send to the wg list (public-payments-wg@w3.org) a list of relevant terms for the api
- Re: GSMA Mobile Payments API
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Operational considerations (#201)
- [w3c/webpayments] Operational considerations (#201)
Thursday, 15 December 2016
- [Minutes] 15 Dec WPWG teleconference
- Re: GSMA Mobile Payments API
- Make travel plans now: WPWG face-to-face meeting 23-24 March in Chicago
- wpwg-ACTION-41: Ask emvco if they would be ok with our use of short strings this way
- wpwg-ACTION-40: Propose changes to pmi spec and payment manifest spec regarding loosening of the https syntax requirement and secure payment method manifest hosting
- Re: GSMA Mobile Payments API
- Re: GSMA Mobile Payments API
Wednesday, 14 December 2016
- GSMA Mobile Payments API
- Minutes [Was: [Agenda] 14 December Payments Apps Task Force Call]
- Re: [Agenda] 14 December Payments Apps Task Force Call
Tuesday, 13 December 2016
- Preparing for conversations about merchant adoption of Payment Request API
- [Agenda] 14 December Payments Apps Task Force Call
Monday, 12 December 2016
- [w3c/webpayments] comma fix (#196)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] try again issue 19 (#198)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Add link to issue 19 (#197)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] [Payment Request] Should we allow a "polling" mechanism for websites to not invoke the API if there are no enabled methods (#159)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Should payment method specifications contain WebIDL? (#133)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] [Payment Request] Should we allow a "polling" mechanism for websites to not invoke the API if there are no enabled methods (#159)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] How should the group update documents in 'TR' space? (#167)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] How should the group update documents in 'TR' space? (#167)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Big reorg (#195)
- [w3c/webpayments] Add link to issue 19 (#197)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Should payment method specifications contain WebIDL? (#133)
- [w3c/webpayments] try again issue 19 (#198)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Added tokenized cards link (#199)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] comma fix (#196)
- [w3c/webpayments] Added tokenized cards link (#199)
- [w3c/webpayments] Updated links on README (#200)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Updated links on README (#200)
Thursday, 8 December 2016
Wednesday, 7 December 2016
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Big reorg (#195)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Big reorg (#195)
- Minutes [Was: [Agenda] 7 December Payments Apps Task Force Call]
- Automatic publication set up for three WPWG specifications
- Re: [Agenda] 8 December 2016 WPWG call
- [Agenda] 8 December 2016 WPWG call
- Re: Payment Manifest Proposal