Wednesday, 31 August 2016
Tuesday, 30 August 2016
- Re: [Agenda] 1 September WPWG teleconference
- [Agenda] 1 September WPWG teleconference
- [Agenda] 31 August Payment Apps task force meeting
Friday, 26 August 2016
Thursday, 25 August 2016
- Re: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- wpwg-ACTION-29: Ask the list about implementors and what they can support for an extant payment method for testing purposes.
- wpwg-ACTION-28: Prepare a "state of affairs", due 2016-09-01
- Re: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- [w3c/webpayments] Fix typo: `fishing` => `phishing`. (#172)
- Payment app authenticity management proposal
Wednesday, 24 August 2016
Tuesday, 23 August 2016
- [Agenda] 24 August Payment Apps task force meeting
- [Agenda] 25 August WPWG teleconference
- Re: Extension to 25 August (1pm EDT) [Was: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages]
Monday, 22 August 2016
- Re: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- Re: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- Re: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
Sunday, 21 August 2016
Friday, 19 August 2016
- Re: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- Re: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- Re: Note on CfC
- RE: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- Re: Introductions: new rep for Ceweb.br/Nic.br
- RE: Introductions: new rep for Ceweb.br/Nic.br
- RE: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- Re: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- [Minutes] 18 August 2016 WPWG teleconference
Thursday, 18 August 2016
- Re: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Pull filters out of payment method data (#170)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Pull filters out of payment method data (#170)
- Introductions: new rep for Ceweb.br/Nic.br
- Note on CfC
- RE: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- Draft regulatory technical standards on strong consumer authentication for payments
- Re: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- wpwg-ACTION-27: Send link to new eba regs to the wg
- Re: [Agenda] 17 August Payment Apps task force meeting
Wednesday, 17 August 2016
- Minutes [Was: [Agenda] 17 August Payment Apps task force meeting]
- Re: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
Tuesday, 16 August 2016
- [Agenda] 17 August Payment Apps task force meeting
- Re: Extension to 25 August (1pm EDT) [Was: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages]
- Extension to 25 August (1pm EDT) [Was: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages]
Monday, 15 August 2016
- Re: Payment Apps Javascript Proposal
- Re: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- Advancing the Web Payments HTTP API and Core Messages
- RE: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- Re: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- Re: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- Re: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- RE: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- Payment Apps Javascript Proposal
- Re: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- RE: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
Friday, 12 August 2016
Thursday, 11 August 2016
- wpwg-ACTION-26: Follow up with amex about security review of specs
- wpwg-ACTION-25: Will write a proposal about storing numbers (#2)
- Re: CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- CfC on publishing HTTP API and Core Messages - ACTION REQUIRED
- Reminder - WPWG meeting at 10:00 ET on 11 August (new meeting time)
Wednesday, 10 August 2016
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Overview document figure 5 (#171)
- Re: Use of URNs for PMIs
- Minutes [Was: [Agenda] 10 August Payment Apps task force meeting]
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Overview document figure 5 (#171)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Overview document figure 5 (#171)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Overview document figure 5 (#171)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Overview document figure 5 (#171)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Overview document figure 5 (#171)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Overview document figure 5 (#171)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Overview document figure 5 (#171)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Overview document figure 5 (#171)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Overview document figure 5 (#171)
- Agenda for tomorrow's teleconference
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Overview document figure 5 (#171)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Overview document figure 5 (#171)
Tuesday, 9 August 2016
Wednesday, 10 August 2016
Tuesday, 9 August 2016
- Re: Use of URNs for PMIs
- Re: Use of URNs for PMIs
- [Agenda] 10 August Payment Apps task force meeting
Monday, 8 August 2016
Friday, 5 August 2016
Thursday, 4 August 2016
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Pull filters out of payment method data (#170)
- [w3c/webpayments] Pull filters out of payment method data (#170)
- W3C has launched Patent Advisory Group for Web Payments Working Group
- Signed REST Requests
Wednesday, 3 August 2016
- Minutes [Was: [Agenda] 3 August Payment Apps task force meeting]
- Re: POLL - Preferred time for WG calls going forward
- [Agenda] 3 August Payment Apps task force meeting
Tuesday, 2 August 2016
- Re: POLL - Preferred time for WG calls going forward
- Re: POLL - Preferred time for WG calls going forward
- Re: POLL - Preferred time for WG calls going forward
- Re: POLL - Preferred time for WG calls going forward
- Re: POLL - Preferred time for WG calls going forward
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Letting the payment app decide between HTTP and Javascript communication (#130)
Monday, 1 August 2016
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Letting the payment app decide between HTTP and Javascript communication (#130)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Letting the payment app decide between HTTP and Javascript communication (#130)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Letting the payment app decide between HTTP and Javascript communication (#130)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Letting the payment app decide between HTTP and Javascript communication (#130)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Letting the payment app decide between HTTP and Javascript communication (#130)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Letting the payment app decide between HTTP and Javascript communication (#130)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Letting the payment app decide between HTTP and Javascript communication (#130)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] [Payment apps] How can we optimize user experience when there is only one match? (#169)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] [Payment apps] How can we optimize user experience when there is only one match? (#169)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] PROPOSAL: A new document structure for this API (#134)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] PROPOSAL: A new document structure for this API (#134)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Should the browser pass user data it has collected (email etc) to the payment app? (#137)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Should the browser pass user data it has collected (email etc) to the payment app? (#137)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] [Payment apps] Should payment instrument details be included at registration? (#142)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] [Payment apps] Should payment instrument details be included at registration? (#142)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] [Payment apps] How should third-party payment apps be displayed by the browser? (#143)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] [Payment apps] How should third-party payment apps be displayed by the browser? (#143)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] [Payment Apps] Extending invocation of payment apps with other techniques than HTTP (#156)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] [Payment apps] What should be the user experience when an app is recommended for two methods? (#155)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] [Payment apps] What should be the user experience when an app is recommended for two methods? (#155)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] [Payment Apps] Extending invocation of payment apps with other techniques than HTTP (#156)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] [Payment Apps] “Security Error” on different origins (#157)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] [Payment Apps] “Security Error” on different origins (#157)
- Re: Payment Request API
- Payment Request API