W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > December 2015

Re: [paymentrequest] Should the Payment Request API only be available in a top-level browsing context? (#30)

From: Ade Bateman <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 14:47:41 -0800
To: WICG/paymentrequest <paymentrequest@noreply.github.com>
Cc: webpayments <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <WICG/paymentrequest/issues/30/163425618@github.com>

You can't impose any of the security requirements with a polyfill.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/WICG/paymentrequest/issues/30#issuecomment-163425618

Received on Wednesday, 9 December 2015 22:48:09 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ade Bateman: "[paymentrequest] What is the format for payment method identifiers for distributed extensibility (#34)"
Previous message: Ade Bateman: "[paymentrequest] Should we support a delegated state for PaymentRequest? (#33)"
In reply to: Ade Bateman: "[paymentrequest] Should the Payment Request API only be available in a top-level browsing context? (#30)"
Next in thread: Jeff Burdges: "Re: [paymentrequest] Should the Payment Request API only be available in a top-level browsing context? (#30)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:12 UTC