Why would you not want a registry of URIs? Discovery is an important part of the way the internet works. Having a well-defined way for applications to learn is critical to developer's ability to dynamically extend their applications. Otherwise you are doomed to hard-code, and you end up only using the things that everyone knows about. That sort of thinking discourages growth. On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:46 AM, ianbjacobs <notifications@github.com> wrote: > I suggest that we NOT maintain a registry of URIs. > If our identifier spec includes short strings, then I think those should > be defined in the WG spec (with appropriate references to what they mean). > For flexibility, the editor's draft of the spec can be updated > by the WG to add "draft" short strings. > > Ian > > — > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/25#issuecomment-162544909>. > -- Shane McCarron halindrome@gmail.com --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/25#issuecomment-162548001Received on Monday, 7 December 2015 14:57:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:12 UTC