- From: Manu Sporny <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 19:55:26 -0800
- To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 3 December 2015 03:55:56 UTC
@rsolomakhin The most concerning part of the installability section of the Web App manifest spec is the following: > How a user agent makes use of these installability signals to determine if a web application can be installed is left to implementers. In general, I'm a bit wary of the whole 'payment instrument as app manifest' approach because there is no trigger that a site can call to be sure that the payment instrument was installed. I'm also not sure what the polyfill story for manifest-based payment instruments are. So, a few questions: 1. What are the upsides and downsides to a manifest-based approach? 2. How does a site that issues payment instruments know if a payment instrument has been installed (or is available)? 3. How would a manifest-based approach be polyfilled? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/14#issuecomment-161508394
Received on Thursday, 3 December 2015 03:55:56 UTC