- From: Martin Thomson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 00:00:47 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
That sort of bias is something that can be left to chairs - and the working group - to manage. Let's say that companies X and Y are strongly dominant in some way. A design team is formed, with a large contingent from those companies. The output of that design team strongly favours these companies. The working group - which should be more diverse - can reject that output on that basis. Much of this is inherent in the W3C [decision-making process](https://www.w3.org/2021/Process-20211102/#Consensus). The IETF follows a [similar](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2026#section-6.5) [process](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2418#section-3.4), following similar [principles](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3935). If the concern is about anti-trust policies, I'm less familiar with those. -- GitHub Notification of comment by martinthomson Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/patwg-charter/pull/48#issuecomment-1376513320 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2023 00:00:48 UTC