- From: Erik Taubeneck via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 19:09:15 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
@martinthomson seems I've mixed up "soft consensus" with "rough consensus", but even then, [looking at the definition from the IEFT](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7282), it doesn't seem appropriate here. My intent was the capture (and to have a place to continue to document) assumptions that can help the editors proceed, and not imply any final commitment. Let me rephrase this. -- GitHub Notification of comment by eriktaubeneck Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/docs-and-reports/pull/35#issuecomment-1446901813 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 27 February 2023 19:09:17 UTC