- From: ekr via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 19:59:14 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
I definitely think it's very important to get the use cases nailed down. Once we've done that, we can try to figure out how many different technical approaches we are going to need. As I see it, the current situation is: 1. We have a set of somewhat clearly defined "conversion measurement" use cases that is what IPA, the Aggregate Measurement API, and PCM are targeting. 2. We have a less well defined (because we haven't talked about it, not to say that someone doesn't have it well defined) optimization use case that is what the Event Conversion Measurement API is targeting. My best case scenario for this meeting would be: 1. Clearly flesh out the conversion measurement use cases and where the existing proposals fall short. 2. Improve our understanding of the optimization use cases. 3. Work out whether we want to try to build one solution that covers both or two solutions. 4. (Stretch goal) Figure out the most promising technical directions and what we would need to do to actually pick a starting point. In terms of meeting time, I think it would be good to have sessions on: - Getting the exhaustive description of the conversion measurement use case. - Gap analysis between IPA/AMAPI/PCM and that use case - Introduction to the optimization use case - Discussion of next steps As I think I've said earlier, I would actually vote to punt everything that's not this, unless people don't feel ready to have these discussions. -- GitHub Notification of comment by ekr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/meetings/issues/51#issuecomment-1129263587 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2022 19:59:15 UTC