Re: [patwg-charter] Following discussion with a number of colleagues this PR covers issue… (#18)

@jwrosewell Considering objections on #8 and the feedback given here I do not believe that changes made to support #8 should be retained in this PR. In addition to other suggested changes to move this towards the point where we can discuss this PR, you should remove those pieces of your changes that are intended for supporting the case made in #8.

Additionally, to short-circuit another round of discussion, I think it would be best for you to remove your changes to the In Scope and Out of Scope sections so we can focus on the other changes. 

The in-scope and out-of-scope changes are so substantial that we cannot discuss them alongside any other changes in the same PR. I think that they may portray a very different group you could seek to get chartered separately from this group, but they seem a bad fit for the goals, as previously established here and in the CG, for this working group. 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by AramZS
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/patwg-charter/pull/18#issuecomment-1121374233 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Monday, 9 May 2022 17:25:01 UTC