- From: Christopher Wood via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 11:12:16 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
One takeaway from the last(?) meeting I recall is we needed a better understanding of the _features_ of each proposal on the table here. That is, to first identify the use cases and the requirements for solving them, and _then_ to determine if MPC (or TEEs or whatever) can suitable solve them. For example, if we find that MPC is not feasible as a replacement for, say, PCM, then that narrows the question of what threat model we ought to consider here. -- GitHub Notification of comment by chris-wood Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/meetings/issues/50#issuecomment-1120963895 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 9 May 2022 11:12:18 UTC