- From: James Rosewell via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 15:28:35 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
@AramZS > This seems to me to be a strong argument towards the consideration of FRAND on a proposal by proposal basis. We don't address IP licensing on a proposal by proposal basis. Why would we do so for the input data? By dealing with the matter at the charter level W3C Members can be assured they will be able to implement any proposal the group develops by the participants of that group. That's an important guarantee. Unlike IP licensing, which has adequately been addressed by W3C Process, input data has not. Therefore it does need to be dealt with at the charter level. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jwrosewell Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/patwg-charter/issues/30#issuecomment-1171362374 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2022 15:28:36 UTC