- From: Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 15:32:32 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
I'll also note that among the proposals there are both Federated learning proposals (in which the data might never leave the device to be recorded and made available under such terms) and device-level data storage proposals (where the data is never to leave the device and only be used using conditions met by the device without any access to central storage by a user agent's maintainer). This goes back to my original objection, since not all proposals may have the data you are concerned with available, even if participants thought making that data available via FRAND was appropriate it would not apply. Therefore adding FRAND to the charter would create issues where it would not apply to a proposal that would then somehow be bound by it. As a lawyer I believe that @timcowen would agree that applying irrelevant binding principles to a document is not good practice? -- GitHub Notification of comment by AramZS Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/patwg-charter/issues/30#issuecomment-1170129890 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2022 15:32:34 UTC