- From: Nick Doty via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 21:20:57 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
Hi Tim, It could be that the loss of formatting or context between Github issue comments and emails has lead to some miscommunication. The paragraph you quote was from James Rosewell, not me, and the following paragraph was my reply to it. James attributed the mandatory licensing/selling idea to you, but I also took it as an explanation of what his previous pull request proposal and other references to licensing of input data would mean, as there had been some confusion about what that could mean. I'm not sure what you meant about "the next point" or what you weren't putting forward -- either the paragraph you quoted or my reply. Our mix of Github, email and other tools can at times be confusing, so I thought I should try to clarify. Thanks, Nick -- GitHub Notification of comment by npdoty Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/meetings/issues/52#issuecomment-1169254617 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2022 21:20:59 UTC