public-patcg@w3.org from June 2022 by date

Thursday, 30 June 2022

• Re: [patwg-charter] All Working Group members agree to licence input data for specifications on FRAND terms (#30) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Pull Request: Addressing #35 - making explicit that proposals should detail the data they intend to use and return. Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Include references to W3C Process and Antitrust Guidelines only (#32) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] All Working Group members agree to licence input data for specifications on FRAND terms (#30) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] All Working Group members agree to licence input data for specifications on FRAND terms (#30) timcowen via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] All Working Group members agree to licence input data for specifications on FRAND terms (#30) ekr via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] All Working Group members agree to licence input data for specifications on FRAND terms (#30) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Include references to W3C Process and Antitrust Guidelines only (#32) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] All Working Group members agree to licence input data for specifications on FRAND terms (#30) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Require Data Section in Success Criteria (#35) Brian May via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Include references to W3C Process and Antitrust Guidelines only (#32) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Require Data Section in Success Criteria (#35) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Require Data Section in Success Criteria (#35) Brian May via GitHub
• Closed: [patwg-charter] All Working Group members agree to licence input data for specifications on FRAND terms (#30) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] All Working Group members agree to licence input data for specifications on FRAND terms (#30) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Align the definition of privacy to laws (#31) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Align the definition of privacy to laws (#31) timcowen via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Align the definition of privacy to laws (#31) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Align the definition of privacy to laws (#31) timcowen via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Align the definition of privacy to laws (#31) Martin Thomson via GitHub

Wednesday, 29 June 2022

• Re: [patwg-charter] Require Data Section in Success Criteria (#35) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Align the definition of privacy to laws (#31) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] All Working Group members agree to licence input data for specifications on FRAND terms (#30) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] All Working Group members agree to licence input data for specifications on FRAND terms (#30) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] All Working Group members agree to licence input data for specifications on FRAND terms (#30) James Rosewell via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Require Data Section in Success Criteria (#35) Brian May via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] All Working Group members agree to licence input data for specifications on FRAND terms (#30) timcowen via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] August 2022 Meeting (#66) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Align the definition of privacy to laws (#31) timcowen via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Following discussion with a number of colleagues this PR covers issue… (#18) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "across multiple devices and browsers" (#7) benjaminsavage via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] remove special case for PATCG feedback (#29) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Merged Pull Request: Clean up stray period Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "across multiple devices and browsers" (#7) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "web features" -> "solutions" (#5) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "web features" -> "solutions" (#5) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: Do not reference S&P questionnaire (#10) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: Do not reference S&P questionnaire (#10) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Align the definition of privacy to laws (#31) Nick Doty via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Align the definition of privacy to laws (#31) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Pull Request: Clean up stray period Braedon Vickers via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] All Working Group members agree to licence input data for specifications on FRAND terms (#30) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] All Working Group members agree to licence input data for specifications on FRAND terms (#30) Nick Doty via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] All Working Group members agree to licence input data for specifications on FRAND terms (#30) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Scope of participation question (#33) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Include references to W3C Process and Antitrust Guidelines only (#32) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Include references to W3C Process and Antitrust Guidelines only (#32) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) James Rosewell via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Include references to W3C Process and Antitrust Guidelines only (#32) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] All Working Group members agree to licence input data for specifications on FRAND terms (#30) ekr via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [patwg-charter] Charter scope and guaranteeing availability of input data (#16) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Charter scope and guaranteeing availability of input data (#16) James Rosewell via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Align the definition of privacy to laws (#31) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] All Working Group members agree to licence input data for specifications on FRAND terms (#30) James Rosewell via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] All Working Group members agree to licence input data for specifications on FRAND terms (#30) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) timcowen via GitHub

Tuesday, 28 June 2022

• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) Nick Doty via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) timcowen via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) Don Marti via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) Nick Doty via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] August 2022 Meeting (#66) James Aylett via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Buy-side use cases + requirements deep dive. (#59) James Aylett via GitHub

Monday, 27 June 2022

• Re: [private-measurement] Strawman: Target privacy constraints (#17) Don Marti via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) timcowen via GitHub
• [docs-and-reports] Pull Request: Add rendered doucments to splash page. Sean Turner via GitHub
• [meetings] August 2022 Meeting (#66) Sean Turner via GitHub

Friday, 24 June 2022

• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Buy-side use cases + requirements deep dive. (#59) Raimundo Mirisola via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] remove special case for PATCG feedback (#29) James Aylett via GitHub

Thursday, 23 June 2022

• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) James Rosewell via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Pull Request: remove special case for PATCG feedback Samuel Weiler via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Pull Request: 'technical measures' scope front and center Samuel Weiler via GitHub
• [meetings] Agenda Request - (CPA?) Composable privacy-preserving architecture (#65) Raimundo Mirisola via GitHub
• Closed: [meetings] Confirm Interest in TPAC F2F (#53) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Closed: [meetings] June 2022 Meeting (#57) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Closed: [meetings] Agenda Request - Call for Scribes for June Meeting (#60) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Call for Scribes for June Meeting (#60) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Closed: [admin] Meeting: 21st & 23rd June 2022 (#7) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [admin] Meeting: 21st & 23rd June 2022 (#7) Sean Turner via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Merged Pull Request: Add anti-fraud CG to liaisons Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Want to add to the upcoming meeting agenda? Here's how (#11) Nick Doty via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - what is the right scope for functionality that should be supported in the first iteration of the joint measurement effort? (#56) benjaminsavage via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - what is the right scope for functionality that should be supported in the first iteration of the joint measurement effort? (#56) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Strawman: Target functionality for MVP (#16) Charlie Harrison via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Strawman: Target privacy constraints (#17) Alberto via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Strawman: Target privacy constraints (#17) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Strawman: Target functionality for MVP (#16) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Strawman: Target functionality for MVP (#16) benjaminsavage via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Strawman: Target privacy constraints (#17) benjaminsavage via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Strawman: Target privacy constraints (#17) Charlie Harrison via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Strawman: Target privacy constraints (#17) benjaminsavage via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Strawman: Target privacy constraints (#17) benjaminsavage via GitHub
• [private-measurement] Strawman: Target Security Constraints (#18) benjaminsavage via GitHub
• Closed: [meetings] Agenda Request - Meeting Pacing Check In (#61) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - what is the right scope for functionality that should be supported in the first iteration of the joint measurement effort? (#56) Charlie Harrison via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - what is the right scope for functionality that should be supported in the first iteration of the joint measurement effort? (#56) Joel Pfeiffer via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - what is the right scope for functionality that should be supported in the first iteration of the joint measurement effort? (#56) Charlie Harrison via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• [meetings] Merged Pull Request: Mariana's slides June 23 meeting Sean Turner via GitHub

Wednesday, 22 June 2022

• [meetings] Pull Request: Mariana's slides June 23 meeting marianapr via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) joshuakoran via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) Nick Doty via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) timcowen via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Strawman: Target privacy constraints (#17) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Strawman: Target privacy constraints (#17) Charlie Harrison via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Strawman: Target privacy constraints (#17) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Strawman: Target functionality for MVP (#16) Charlie Harrison via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Strawman: Target functionality for MVP (#16) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Strawman: Target functionality for MVP (#16) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Strawman: Target privacy constraints (#17) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Strawman: Target privacy constraints (#17) benjaminsavage via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Strawman: Target privacy constraints (#17) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - what is the right scope for functionality that should be supported in the first iteration of the joint measurement effort? (#56) benjaminsavage via GitHub
• [private-measurement] Strawman: Target privacy constraints (#17) benjaminsavage via GitHub

Tuesday, 21 June 2022

• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• [private-measurement] Strawman: Target functionality for MVP (#16) benjaminsavage via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) James Rosewell via GitHub
• “What” not "who”: the need to amend 1st and 3rd party thinking James Rosewell
• [meetings] Merged Pull Request: Add slides for cross-device stuff Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Add slides for cross-device stuff (#63) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [docs-and-reports] Adding myself (#6) Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Call for Scribes for June Meeting (#60) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Review Working Group Charter Changes (#52) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Confirm Interest in TPAC F2F (#53) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Add slides for cross-device stuff (#63) Sean Turner via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Pull Request: Add anti-fraud CG to liaisons Martin Thomson via GitHub
• [patcg.github.io] Merged Pull Request: Align statement on meeting frequency to practice Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Merged Pull Request: propose a meeting schedule; remove empty history lines Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [patwg-charter] GitHub pages (#26) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] GitHub pages (#26) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Merged Pull Request: Link rendered draft Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [admin] Meeting: 21st & 23rd June 2022 (#7) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] GitHub pages (#26) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• [meetings] Pull Request: Add slides for cross-device stuff Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Closed: [meetings] Review Charter Changes (#36) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Following discussion with a number of colleagues this PR covers issue… (#18) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Buy-side use cases + requirements deep dive. (#59) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - what is the right scope for functionality that should be supported in the first iteration of the joint measurement effort? (#56) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - what is the right scope for functionality that should be supported in the first iteration of the joint measurement effort? (#56) marianapr via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - what is the right scope for functionality that should be supported in the first iteration of the joint measurement effort? (#56) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - what is the right scope for functionality that should be supported in the first iteration of the joint measurement effort? (#56) marianapr via GitHub

Monday, 20 June 2022

• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - what is the right scope for functionality that should be supported in the first iteration of the joint measurement effort? (#56) Charlie Harrison via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - what is the right scope for functionality that should be supported in the first iteration of the joint measurement effort? (#56) marianapr via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Following discussion with a number of colleagues this PR covers issue… (#18) James Rosewell via GitHub
• [meetings] Merged Pull Request: Agenda for June Meeting Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda for June Meeting (#62) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [meetings] Pull Request: Agenda for June Meeting Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] June 2022 Meeting (#57) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Buy-side use cases + requirements deep dive. (#59) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Following discussion with a number of colleagues this PR covers issue… (#18) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Cross-Device Attribution (#58) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [meetings] Agenda Request - Meeting Pacing Check In (#61) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [meetings] Agenda Request - Call for Scribes for June Meeting (#60) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [meetings] Schedule next meeting (#19) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [meetings] Agenda Request - Buy-side use cases + requirements deep dive. (#59) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [meetings] Agenda Request - Measurement use-cases deep dive and requirements (#51) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Measurement use-cases deep dive and requirements (#51) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Measurement use-cases deep dive and requirements (#51) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Confirm Interest in TPAC F2F (#53) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - PARAKEET / MaCAW / Masked LARK adoption in Chrome (#16) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] June 2022 Meeting (#57) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] June 2022 Meeting (#57) Przemysław Iwańczak via GitHub
• Re: [docs-and-reports] Principle: Don't use Entropy (#4) Martin Thomson via GitHub

Friday, 17 June 2022

• Re: [docs-and-reports] Principle: Don't use Entropy (#4) Charlie Harrison via GitHub
• Re: [docs-and-reports] Principle: Don't use Entropy (#4) Martin Thomson via GitHub

Thursday, 16 June 2022

• Re: [docs-and-reports] Principle: Don't use Entropy (#4) Charlie Harrison via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Use Case: Different Attribution Models (#15) Alex Cone via GitHub

Wednesday, 15 June 2022

• Re: [meetings] Want to add to the upcoming meeting agenda? Here's how (#11) Nick Doty via GitHub

Monday, 13 June 2022

• Re: [proposals] Aggregate measurement with the Private Aggregation API (#13) Alex Turner via GitHub

Saturday, 11 June 2022

• [patcg.github.io] Pull Request: Align statement on meeting frequency to practice James Aylett via GitHub

Wednesday, 8 June 2022

• Closed: [meetings] May 2022 Meeting (#48) Sean Turner via GitHub
• [admin] Meeting: 21st & 23rd June 2022 (#7) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Event Invitation: Private Advertising Technology CG Meeting W3C Calendar
• Closed: [admin] Meeting: 17th & 19th May 2022 (#6) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [admin] Meeting: 17th & 19th May 2022 (#6) Sean Turner via GitHub

Tuesday, 7 June 2022

• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Measurement use-cases deep dive and requirements (#51) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Cross-Device Attribution (#58) Sebastian Zimmeck via GitHub

Monday, 6 June 2022

• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Cross-Device Attribution (#58) marianapr via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] June 2022 Meeting (#57) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Closed: [meetings] Agenda Request - Keeping good ads off bad sites (#49) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Questions about Collusion - What can be done about the collusion risk in these systems? (#12) Brian May via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Cross-Device Attribution (#58) bedfordsean via GitHub

Sunday, 5 June 2022

• [patwg-charter] Pull Request: Link rendered draft Wendy Seltzer via GitHub

Friday, 3 June 2022

• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - what is the right scope for functionality that should be supported in the first iteration of the joint measurement effort? (#56) Charlie Harrison via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• [meetings] Agenda Request - Cross-Device Attribution (#58) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Keeping good ads off bad sites (#49) Martin Thomson via GitHub

Thursday, 2 June 2022

• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - what is the right scope for functionality that should be supported in the first iteration of the joint measurement effort? (#56) ekr via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Confirm Interest in TPAC F2F (#53) Paul deGrandis via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Confirm Interest in TPAC F2F (#53) Richa Jain via GitHub

Wednesday, 1 June 2022

• Re: [meetings] Confirm Interest in TPAC F2F (#53) Brian May via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - what is the right scope for functionality that should be supported in the first iteration of the joint measurement effort? (#56) Alberto via GitHub

Last message date: Thursday, 30 June 2022 18:40:42 UTC