- From: Erik Taubeneck via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 22:18:02 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
> Second, I recommend looking at [this comment](https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/334#issuecomment-662659706) and the others that refer back to it. It seems clear that recordings that get published are a serious risk of being used for harassment, in ways that I as a white guy have not needed to worry about. This CG is likely to work on proposals that trigger strong reactions from some parts of the web, which I expect further elevates this risk. This consideration was enough to change my mind quite convincingly. Thank you for sharing @michaelkleber. Accessibility and inclusion are incumbent to our mission here (and that of the W3C), and it seems clear that there are both positives and negatives along this dimension when it comes publicly available recordings. I also believe that we can capture those positives in other ways. For example, 1. We've committed to rotating the timing of the meetings, discussed in #4, so that every 3rd meeting will be inconvenient or inaccessible to each timezone. 2. We are discussing in #6 the best approach to take useful minutes and notes, and I have committed to contribute to the scribing effort when I'm able to attend. I am confident we will be able to find ways to minimize the legitimate concerns of those who would find a recording helpful, without creating the risk that the linked comment clearly articulates. If there are other specific concerns (and hopefully creative solutions), I'd encourage folks to raise issues specific to those concerns so that we can address them (similar to how they are addressed in the two issues above.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by eriktaubeneck Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/meetings/issues/10#issuecomment-1017976000 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 20 January 2022 22:18:06 UTC