- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 17:57:30 -0500
- To: ekr via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>, public-patcg@w3.org
On 2022-01-13 17:53, ekr via GitHub wrote: > I agree with @martinthomson's points here. I would further add that we > should make actually picking a proposal out of scope for this next > meeting unless there is just obvious consensus. Rather, we should use > the time to flesh out requirements and the option space and make sure > everyone is up to speed. Then the proponents can go away and do whatever > changes they want, including merges, and then we can try to pick one a > bit later. This will allow us to have a good discussion without people > feeling proprietary about their ideas at this stage. Agreed on all counts, and I would add that if we end up spending almost all of our time on moving this forward then I think that's time well spent. -- Robin Berjon VP Data Governance The New York Times Company
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2022 22:57:45 UTC