public-patcg@w3.org from February 2022 by date

Monday, 28 February 2022

• Re: [patcg.github.io] clarify deliverables of the group (#4) Nick Doty via GitHub
• [patcg.github.io] Pull Request: clarify charter scope Nick Doty via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] clarify deliverables of the group (#4) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub

Thursday, 24 February 2022

• [private-measurement] Generate Test Cases for Evaluations (#7) betuldurak via GitHub
• [meetings] April 2022 Meeting (#34) Sean Turner via GitHub

Wednesday, 23 February 2022

• Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) ekr via GitHub
• [admin] Proposed PATWG Charter (#3) ekr via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) jdelhommeau via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Mike O'Neill via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) nlongcn via GitHub

Sunday, 20 February 2022

• [private-measurement] Feature Discussion: High Risk Contexts (#6) Don Marti via GitHub

Friday, 18 February 2022

• Re: [meetings] First pass at minutes (#31) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] Collecting Privacy Measurement discussion topics centrally (#2) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [private-measurement] Collecting Privacy Measurement discussion topics centrally (#2) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [private-measurement] Why should attribution solutions default to on? (Default to on debate) (#5) James Rosewell via GitHub
• [private-measurement] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#4) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Closed: [meetings] Private Measurement Review (#17) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [private-measurement] Utility vs Privacy for attribution proposals (#3) Bosko Milekic via GitHub

Thursday, 17 February 2022

• Re: [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32) Nick Doty via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Mike O'Neill via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) joshuakoran via GitHub

Wednesday, 16 February 2022

• Re: [meetings] Meeting Cadence and Timing? (#4) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [private-measurement] Collecting Privacy Measurement discussion topics centrally (#2) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [meetings] Should we already have a separate repo for discussing measurement? (#33) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Should we already have a separate repo for discussing measurement? (#33) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [private-measurement] This space is not yet actively hooked up to the w3c listserv (#1) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [private-measurement] This space is not yet actively hooked up to the w3c listserv (#1) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) benjaminsavage via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) Stefan Haase via GitHub

Tuesday, 15 February 2022

• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) Christopher Wood via GitHub
• [proposals] new commits pushed by AramZS Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [proposals] new commits pushed by AramZS Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) benjaminsavage via GitHub

Monday, 14 February 2022

• Re: [meetings] Should we already have a separate repo for discussing measurement? (#33) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Should we already have a separate repo for discussing measurement? (#33) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) Lexi Robinson via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) Bosko Milekic via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) Lexi Robinson via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) Santi Darmandrail via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Should we already have a separate repo for discussing measurement? (#33) Brian May via GitHub
• [meetings] Should we already have a separate repo for discussing measurement? (#33) Erik Anderson via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) Lexi Robinson via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) Lexi Robinson via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) Santi Darmandrail via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) Santi Darmandrail via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) jdelhommeau via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Utility vs Privacy for attribution proposals (#25) Alexandre Nderagakura via GitHub

Sunday, 13 February 2022

• Re: [patcg.github.io] chair selection is complex and open to abuse (#1) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Utility vs Privacy for attribution proposals (#25) Brian May via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Utility vs Privacy for attribution proposals (#25) Bosko Milekic via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) medicinalcocaine3434 via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Utility vs Privacy for attribution proposals (#25) Brian May via GitHub

Saturday, 12 February 2022

• Re: [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32) Don Marti via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) James Aylett via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) Shivan Kaul Sahib via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32) Brian May via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) benjaminsavage via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Utility vs Privacy for attribution proposals (#25) Bosko Milekic via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32) Don Marti via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) Lexi Robinson via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) Shivan Kaul Sahib via GitHub

Friday, 11 February 2022

• [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [meetings] Pull Request: First pass at minutes Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) Sam Sneddon via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) ansuz via GitHub
• [meetings] Merged Pull Request: Adding Bucketization-Microsoft slides Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [meetings] Merged Pull Request: Add Aggregate API with PPM slides Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [meetings] Merged Pull Request: Merge Proposal summaries and Masked LARk Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) pjl-google via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) kirangopinath71 via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Mearca via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Raimundo Mirisola via GitHub
• [meetings] Pull Request: Proposal summaries and lark Joel Pfeiffer via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Utility vs Privacy for attribution proposals (#25) Brian May via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) betuldurak via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Mike O'Neill via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] chair selection is complex and open to abuse (#1) Nick Doty via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Michael Kleber via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Mike O'Neill via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Michael Kleber via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Nick Doty via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Mike O'Neill via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] clarify scope is not just browser features (#3) Nick Doty via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• [meetings] Pull Request: Add Aggregate API with PPM slides marianapr via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Mike O'Neill via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Mike O'Neill via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Alexandre Nderagakura via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) jdelhommeau via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Martin Pál via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Ben Savage
• [meetings] Closed Pull Request: Adding Bucketization-Microsoft slides betuldurak via GitHub
• [meetings] Pull Request: Adding Bucketization-Microsoft slides betuldurak via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Brad Chen via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Take up Private Attribution Proposals (#9) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [meetings] Take up Private Attribution Proposals (#9) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [meetings] Agenda Request - Day 2 Q&A (#14) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [patcg.github.io] Charter needs to allow for competitive solutions not exclusively controlled by browsers (#5) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Closed: [meetings] Call for Scribes - 2022-02 Meeting (#22) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub

Thursday, 10 February 2022

• Re: [admin] Meeting cadence (#2) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Closed: [admin] Meeting cadence (#2) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [admin] Review and improve security/privacy disclosure policy (#1) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Alex Cone
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Kiran Gopinath
• Re: [proposals] Collection of known research and literature on user perceptions of (novel) privacy enhancing technologies (#10) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• [proposals] Collection of known research and literature on user perceptions of (novel) privacy enhancing technologies (#10) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Charter needs to allow for competitive solutions not exclusively controlled by browsers (#9) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Charter needs to allow for competitive solutions not exclusively controlled by browsers (#9) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Notice and consent debate (#5) James Rosewell via GitHub
• [meetings] Merged Pull Request: Add IRC details to agenda Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Add IRC details to agenda (#27) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [meetings] Pull Request: Add IRC details to agenda Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Notice and consent debate (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Secret ballots (#26) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Possible solutions debate (#7) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Expansion on Delegation and Privacy Budget Tradeoffs (#8) Charlie Harrison via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Possible solutions debate (#7) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Secret ballots (#26) Jeffrey Yasskin via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Charter needs to allow for competitive solutions not exclusively controlled by browsers (#9) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Charter needs to allow for competitive solutions not exclusively controlled by browsers (#9) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Possible solutions debate (#7) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Charter needs to allow for competitive solutions not exclusively controlled by browsers (#9) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] chair selection is complex and open to abuse (#1) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Charter needs to allow for competitive solutions not exclusively controlled by browsers (#9) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Charter needs to allow for competitive solutions not exclusively controlled by browsers (#9) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Expansion on Delegation and Privacy Budget Tradeoffs (#8) Brian May via GitHub
• Closed: [meetings] Secret ballots (#26) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Secret ballots (#26) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [proposals] Charter needs to allow for competitive solutions not exclusively controlled by browsers (#9) James Rosewell via GitHub
• [meetings] Secret ballots (#26) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Closed: [proposals] Expansion on Delegation and Privacy Budget Tradeoffs (#8) Alexander Brasil via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Expansion on Delegation and Privacy Budget Tradeoffs (#8) Alexander Brasil via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Notice and consent debate (#5) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Notice and consent debate (#5) Mike O'Neill via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Utility vs Privacy for attribution proposals (#25) lmarkou1 via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Utility vs Privacy for attribution proposals (#25) Sanjay Saravanan via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) Alexandre Nderagakura via GitHub
• [meetings] Utility vs Privacy for attribution proposals (#25) Bosko Milekic via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Notice and consent debate (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Possible solutions debate (#7) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Possible solutions debate (#7) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why should attribution solutions default to on? (#6) bedfordsean via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Sanjay Saravanan via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why should attribution solutions default to on? (#6) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (#5) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (#5) jdelhommeau via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Expansion on Delegation and Privacy Budget Tradeoffs (#8) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Expansion on Delegation and Privacy Budget Tradeoffs (#8) Charlie Harrison via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Expansion on Delegation and Privacy Budget Tradeoffs (#8) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Expansion on Delegation and Privacy Budget Tradeoffs (#8) Charlie Harrison via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Add attribution-tradeoffs-goog.pdf slides (#24) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [meetings] Merged Pull Request: Add attribution-tradeoffs-goog.pdf slides Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Alex via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Michael Kleber via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (#5) Alex via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Christopher Wood via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (#5) jdelhommeau via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (#5) Mike O'Neill via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (#5) Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (#5) jdelhommeau via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (#5) Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (#5) Alexandre Nderagakura via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (#5) Alexander Brasil via GitHub
• [proposals] Expansion on Delegation and Privacy Budget Tradeoffs (#8) Alexander Brasil via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) jdelhommeau via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (#5) jdelhommeau via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] chair selection is complex and open to abuse (#1) Nick Doty via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Kim Laine via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Charlie Harrison via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) ekr via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) ekr via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Charlie Harrison via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (#5) Michal Bryc via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Michael Kleber via GitHub
• [meetings] Pull Request: Add attribution-tradeoffs-goog.pdf slides Charlie Harrison via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Can non-members attend meetings? (#21) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] clarify deliverables of the group (#4) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] clarify scope is not just browser features (#3) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] notify the group via the mailing list (#2) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Can non-members attend meetings? (#21) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] chair selection is complex and open to abuse (#1) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) ekr via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (#5) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• [meetings] Merged Pull Request: Slides from Mozilla/Strategy presentation Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) Alex via GitHub
• [proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7) James Rosewell via GitHub
• [proposals] Why should attribution solutions default to on? (#6) James Rosewell via GitHub
• [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (#5) James Rosewell via GitHub

Wednesday, 9 February 2022

• [meetings] Pull Request: Slides from Mozilla/Strategy presentation Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) Andrew Pascoe via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Take up Private Attribution Proposals (#9) Raimundo Mirisola via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) James Aylett via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - PARAKEET / MaCAW / Masked LARK adoption in Chrome (#16) Michael Kleber via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) Brian May via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) George via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) Alex via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) benjaminsavage via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - PARAKEET / MaCAW / Masked LARK adoption in Chrome (#16) Brian May via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - PARAKEET / MaCAW / Masked LARK adoption in Chrome (#16) Erik Anderson via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Call for Scribes - 2022-02 Meeting (#22) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Take up Private Attribution Proposals (#9) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Can non-members attend meetings? (#21) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Can non-members attend meetings? (#21) Nick Doty via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) Simon J Harris via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Call for Scribes - 2022-02 Meeting (#22) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Call for Scribes - 2022-02 Meeting (#22) Sean Turner via GitHub
• [meetings] Merged Pull Request: Creating a draft of the working agenda Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Creating a draft of the working agenda (#20) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Call for Scribes - 2022-02 Meeting (#22) Mark Kent via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Creating a draft of the working agenda (#20) Michael Kleber via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Call for Scribes - 2022-02 Meeting (#22) Michael Kleber via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Publish agenda in advance with links to relevant information. (#13) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Call for Scribes - 2022-02 Meeting (#22) Sergey Tumakha via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Take up Private Attribution Proposals (#9) marianapr via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) Wendy Seltzer via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) Lukasz Wlodarczyk via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Call for Scribes - 2022-02 Meeting (#22) Nick Doty via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Take up Private Attribution Proposals (#9) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) Brad Lassey via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Call for Scribes - 2022-02 Meeting (#22) bedfordsean via GitHub
• [meetings] Call for Scribes - 2022-02 Meeting (#22) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - PARAKEET / MaCAW / Masked LARK adoption in Chrome (#16) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - PARAKEET / MaCAW / Masked LARK adoption in Chrome (#16) Lukasz Wlodarczyk via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - PARAKEET / MaCAW / Masked LARK adoption in Chrome (#16) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) Brian May via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - PARAKEET / MaCAW / Masked LARK adoption in Chrome (#16) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - PARAKEET / MaCAW / Masked LARK adoption in Chrome (#16) Lukasz Wlodarczyk via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - PARAKEET / MaCAW / Masked LARK adoption in Chrome (#16) Alex via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Can non-members attend meetings? (#21) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Take up Private Attribution Proposals (#9) marianapr via GitHub
• [meetings] Can non-members attend meetings? (#21) Jeffrey Yasskin via GitHub

Tuesday, 8 February 2022

• Re: [meetings] Take up Private Attribution Proposals (#9) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [meetings] Pull Request: Creating a draft of the working agenda Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Private Measurement Review (#17) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [meetings] Schedule next meeting (#19) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - PARAKEET / MaCAW / Masked LARK adoption in Chrome (#16) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Private Measurement Review (#17) Erik Anderson via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Take up Private Attribution Proposals (#9) Erik Anderson via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Take up Private Attribution Proposals (#9) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Take up Private Attribution Proposals (#9) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [meetings] Private Measurement Review (#17) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) Alex via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) ekr via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Mechanism for Meeting Minutes (#6) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [meetings] Mechanism for Meeting Minutes (#6) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: Event Invitation: Private Advertising Technology CG Meeting Rotem Dar
• Re: Event Invitation: Private Advertising Technology CG Meeting Sean Turner

Monday, 7 February 2022

• Re: Event Invitation: Private Advertising Technology CG Meeting Davide Rosamilia
• Re: [meetings] Take up Private Attribution Proposals (#9) Charlie Harrison via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Take up Private Attribution Proposals (#9) ekr via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Take up Private Attribution Proposals (#9) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub

Friday, 4 February 2022

• Re: [meetings] Take up Private Attribution Proposals (#9) Charlie Harrison via GitHub
• [meetings] Agenda Request - (#16) Paul Farrow via GitHub

Thursday, 3 February 2022

• Re: [meetings] Take up Private Attribution Proposals (#9) Erik Anderson via GitHub

Wednesday, 2 February 2022

• [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Josh Karlin via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Consider recording meetings (#10) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Closed: [meetings] Consider recording meetings (#10) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] January 2022 Meeting (#5) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Event Invitation: Private Advertising Technology CG Meeting W3C Calendar

Last message date: Monday, 28 February 2022 23:31:23 UTC