Re: [private-measurement] Generate Test Cases for Evaluations (#7)

This is where I think that having tests is getting a little too far ahead of the other developments.  When we discussed IPA with a few cryptographers a few weeks back it became clear to me (as it was already clear to others) that the precise nature of the information leakage from the design has a somewhat intimate relationship with the performance of the system.  We have to carefully balance that leakage in order to get acceptable performance in all senses: computation, communication, and utility for advertising use cases.

We still have a range of designs that are fairly divergent in certain ways, with different ways of approaching the problems.  So it might be difficult to agree that one particular type of leakage (for instance, the number of events that are input to the system from a single user might leak to MPC participants) needs to fit a particular envelope when other designs have a completely different approach that doesn't include that leakage at all.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by martinthomson
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/private-measurement/issues/7#issuecomment-1091919654 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 7 April 2022 16:04:52 UTC