- From: Alex Cone via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 13:45:14 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
In response to @martinthomson's question: > Does [unsanctioned](https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/unsanctioned-tracking/) work better? I certainly do not think we should insert a new term in this group's charter when "unsanctioned" is what TAG uses. Though I think over time we're likely to see evolution in even the term "unsanctioned" which to me still has an aura of passing a lot of requirements off on the end user and could be difficult to affirm. Anyway, I think if we have to use any word it should be in sync with TAG. In response to @benjaminsavage proposed language change: >"Private Advertising Technologies standardised by the working group should minimally not enable either [cross site recognition](https://w3ctag.github.io/privacy-principles/#hl-recognition-cross-site) or [same-site recognition](https://w3ctag.github.io/privacy-principles/#hl-recognition-same-site) which links identity across the clearing of cookies and caches." The same-site clause above seems very tied to current technologies like cookies and caches even if you are using the term "like" as a way to say "this is just an example." Perhaps something like this? >"Private Advertising Technologies standardised by the working group must keep what can be learned about an individual user over time to same-site (or app in the event these standards are adopted by operating systems) and respect user-level controls." -- GitHub Notification of comment by alextcone Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/patwg-charter/issues/6#issuecomment-1091759489 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2022 13:45:15 UTC