- From: Martin Thomson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 16:36:48 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
Again, this appears to veer off in unexpected tangents, but I wanted to object to the notion that we might address ALL of the requirements an advertiser might deem essential. Some practices might contravene established policies. Other might not be possible within the framework set out by this group. What is more reasonable is that people bring requirements here and we discuss if and how those might be accommodated, either by existing work that is planned and agreed, with or without changes. Or whether we might want to take on more work to address those use cases. OR... whether we might defer that particular request on the basis we have enough work already. ORRR (and this is the big one) that the request is not something the group wants to take on. All of these options are possible. Just because you have use cases doesn't mean you have a right. If this was simply to request that we consider that advertisers of different sizes have different needs and that we might avoid privileging the needs of the large (implied: over the small), that's entirely reasonable, but that is not necessarily a matter for the charter. That might be a principle we agree to (or one that already exists in the W3C literature, I suspect it does already in some form). -- GitHub Notification of comment by martinthomson Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/patwg-charter/issues/7#issuecomment-1089000954 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2022 16:36:49 UTC