Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39)

@bmayd I'm not sure I agree with your framing. Specifically:

> If folks have already determined that sensitive data is required and that it will be available

I think (and am assuming) that we have broad consensus that individual cross site behavior data is considered sensitive data, and we have a number of measurement proposals (Attribution Reporting API, IPA, PCM) which construct some way of making that available. 

To be clear, the diagram above is not meant to be the framework for everything this group does, but it does seem to be a helpful abstraction for a common pattern that emerges in some of the existing proposals within this space.

> I would find it very helpful to preface discussion of the technologies with review of those things.

This review is better suited for other topics on the agenda, specifically the Update on the Privacy Principles and the consensus on the charter. Unless the consensus is that we will do nothing in the form of a *private computation*, then I don't see any harm in making progress in a discussion around the underlying technologies this group is already proposing being leveraged.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by eriktaubeneck
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/meetings/issues/39#issuecomment-1086377755 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 1 April 2022 22:15:34 UTC