- From: Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 16:30:23 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
> In relation to Google. There is a significant "distraction tax" for the rest of the industry continuing to debate and engage with Google proposals, or other proposals that would require Google to implement them if the web is not to splinter, unless those proposals have been approved in principle by the CMA. As someone who is not the CMA or Google I'm encouraging the parties to communicate clearly to avoid wasting our valuable time. I take exception to being reprimanded for stating a fact and requesting clarification. I don't disagree that proposals raise specific requirements of attention and time. I just want to be very clear that we cannot deal with objections to those proposals stemming from taking the position that Google or CMA is going to say something about them... because we must see those actual entities speak up. If you have specific objections, they get lost in having to parse out what is your position vs what is you speaking about theoretical actions you believe will happen but have not. In terms of how we engage with these proposals as a group and spend our time, I think the right place to ask those questions is to build a clear process around incoming proposals and how we handle them, the discussion for which is happening at https://github.com/patcg/patcg.github.io/pull/7 -- GitHub Notification of comment by AramZS Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/patwg-charter/issues/8#issuecomment-1086116158 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 1 April 2022 16:30:24 UTC