Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8)

> Additionally, can the group agree to a ban on making frivolous claims on behalf of regulators? It keeps coming up in random issues and I have seen no evidence that they are helpful or represent anything other than wishful interpretations.

**I'm in favor of that @darobin**, however if an outright ban is too large a pill for some to swallow perhaps we could _at a minimum_ agree that any legal references, written or live in meetings, be prepended by "It is my understanding of law xyz that..." or "My interpretation of regulatory proceeding 123 is..." In this way readers or listeners can be reminded that the speaker is sharing their personal interpretation or understanding of a law or related proceedings.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by alextcone
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/patwg-charter/issues/8#issuecomment-1085852825 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 1 April 2022 12:43:25 UTC