- From: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie+@cs.cmu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 09:13:50 -0400
- To: Giles Hogben <giles.hogben@jrc.it>
- Cc: "'Rigo Wenning'" <rigo@w3.org>, "'public-p3p-spec'" <public-p3p-spec@w3.org>
OK, back up.... So are you proposing that P3P1.1 P3P policies have a different name space than P3P 1.0 policies? If so, then that may be a problem, as we were trying to avoid introducing a new name space. Lorrie On Aug 23, 2005, at 9:01 AM, Giles Hogben wrote: > > No I'm not suggesting that. The import is of the P3P 1.0 schema not > the > P3P1.0 base data schema (which is not an XSD schema and therefore > can't be > imported) because you need to use the yes/no attribute (and we > would like to > use the optional attribute) > > >> **-----Original Message----- >> **From: public-p3p-spec-request@w3.org >> **[mailto:public-p3p-spec-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lorrie Cranor >> **Sent: 23 August 2005 14:54 >> **To: giles.hogben@jrc.it >> **Cc: Rigo Wenning; 'public-p3p-spec' >> **Subject: Re: Base Data Schema definition >> ** >> ** >> ** >> **So Giles is proposing that the new P3P 1.1 base data schema import >> **the old P3P 1.0 base data schema by reference? If so, then probably >> **no reason to reproduce the 1.0 schema in 1.1. But maybe that is not >> **what you are asking? >> ** >> **Lorrie >> ** >> ** >> **On Aug 23, 2005, at 4:00 AM, giles.hogben@jrc.it wrote: >> ** >> **> xsd:import looks closed to me. >> **> It validated so the syntax should be OK. >> **> Fine to change the namespace. >> **> >> **> Not sure I understand the last question. I would leave that up to >> **> Lorrie. >> **> >> **> >> **> ----- Original Message ----- >> **> From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org> >> **> Date: Thursday, August 18, 2005 2:30 pm >> **> Subject: Base Data Schema definition >> **> >> **> >> **> Giles, >> **> >> **> in your new base data schema draft, you start like this: >> **> >> **> <xsd:schema >> **> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" >> **> xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/BDSP3Pv1.1" >> **> xmlns:p3p="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/P3Pv1" >> **> xmlns:p3pbds="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/BDSP3Pv1.1" >> **> elementFormDefault="qualified" >> **> targetNamespace="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/BDSP3Pv1.1"> >> **> <xsd:import >> **> schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/P3Pv1.xsd" >> **> namespace="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/P3Pv1" /> >> **> >> **> I think, the targetNamespace MUST be something different. >> **It should >> **> be a >> **> new namespace. Suggestion is /2005/08/BDS-P3P11 >> **> >> **> You fail to close <xsd:import> >> **> >> **> Does that mean, the old 1.0 Schema should be replaced in the Spec >> **> as it >> **> is already in the 1.0 REC and can be imported from there? >> **Or should we >> **> provide a combined XML Schema? >> **> >> **> Best, >> **> >> **> Rigo >> **> >> ** >> ** >> > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2005 13:14:46 UTC