Re: Art 10: Issue 4 - Security Measures

Looks good except
- one typo (specify and seals --> specify seals)
- maybe change "seals" to "seals or certification programs" to make it 
a little more clear what we are talking about.

Lorrie


On Thursday, February 5, 2004, at 03:12 AM, Giles Hogben wrote:

>
> Here is the latest suggested modification and text for the Spec:
>
> Security issues:
> We suggest using the existing disputes attribute which is a 
> placeholder for
> seals of any type (which can then be included in the browser's list of
> approved seals, along with a type attribute).
>
> Accompanying text for spec (Section 3.2.6, after independent
> organization...):
>
> Policy writers may also use this attribute to specify and seals 
> related to
> the entity's information practices (including privacy and security 
> seals).
>
> -------------------------------------
> Giles Hogben
> European Commission Joint Research Centre
> Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen Cybersecurity
> New technologies for Combatting Fraud Unit
>
> giles.hogben @ jrc.it
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 6 February 2004 11:15:11 UTC