- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 16:05:35 +0200
- To: public-p3p-spec <public-p3p-spec@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <200404071605.35226.rigo@w3.org>
Dear all, I took an action item last week[1] to explain further about the W3C Team Note around privacy in Web services[2]. In the ongoing discussion about Web Services and Privacy in special and policy in more general terms, the Web Services Activity needed something more concrete. I pointed Hugo Haas, Web Services Activity Lead to our early notes[3]. I explained the concept of the generic p3p attribute as initially suggested by Steven Pemberton to Hugo Haas and Phillippe Le Hégaret (Architecture Domain Lead) We had intense internal discussions with Massimo about the meaning of the attribute. The discussions were extended to Lorrie and the P3P Group. I came to the conclusion that the generic p3p attribute as it stands today is more a suggestion to XML Schema makers on how to use P3P in their context and allow them (even expect them) to further constrain the attribute in the context of their application/interface description. The team-note in [2] does exactly that. It uses the p3p generic attribute to link policies! (not PRF) to Web Services interfaces allowing and constraining the use of the P3P attribute in WSDL. This can be taken up by a WG and be transformed into some Rec-Track or WG Note to give it even more authority. Best, Rigo 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-p3p-spec/2004Mar/0054.html 2. http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/p3p-wsdl/ 3. http://www.w3.org/P3P/2003/p3p-beyond-http/
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2004 10:06:18 UTC