- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:26:08 +0200
- To: "Humphrey, Jack" <JHumphrey@coremetrics.com>
- Cc: public-p3p-spec@w3.org
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:52:23AM -0500, Humphrey, Jack wrote: > > There were some questions about the goals of this proposal. People > > thought it was useful for companies to be able to declare that all of > > their multiple domains are owned by a single company and comply with > > the same policy, but there was less interest in being able to declare > > that companies belong to an ad network. The reason browsers are > > treating these as third party cookies is that is how consumers seem to > > want to see them treated. > > I see this point. This proposal actually only addresses declaring that > multiple domains belong to the same company. It does not attempt to address > the agent/ad network type of relationships. I will make that clear in my > upcoming proposed specification changes. One of the reasons we came up with thoughts about agent/domain relationsships was the ability to express contractual relationsships between entities and to ease the task of integrating content from different parties. As far as I can see, there is only a proposal about the same entity, but no proposal for services acting as agents e.g. Jack, could you please explore and report back on the call of 1 oct.? Thanks -- Rigo Wenning W3C/ERCIM Policy Analyst Privacy Activity Lead mail:rigo@w3.org 2004, Routes des Lucioles http://www.w3.org/ F-06902 Sophia Antipolis
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2003 09:09:06 UTC