Re: Grouping Statements Proposal

Hi Lorrie,

thanks for your work! I've read through it and have only minor changes:
- Typo in Heading 3.7.2 "STATMENT-GROUP"
- Thanks for renaming 'required' to 'always'. This is more intuitive.
- By defining that for required="always", all inside statements must not 
have a required attribute, one can allow 'ours' and 'current' in 'mixed' as 
well as 'always' groups. I changed the spec accordingly.
- I agree that it may be easier to understand if statement-group-def and 
statement-group are explained together. In this case, the STATEMENT section 
in the consolidated spec should contain a reference/pointer to the 
STATEMENT-GROUP extension.

Enclosed is an update an a HTML-diff (note that this is experimental; just 
look at the differences in the text; it garbles the BNF).

Regards,
  matthias



At 02:35 PM 9/10/2003 -0400, Lorrie Cranor wrote:
>Here is a revised version that addresses the issues we discussed on last 
>week's call. Rigo, please post. Everyone, please review and send comments.
>
>Lorrie
>
>
>

-- Dr. Matthias Schunter <mts (at) zurich.ibm.com> ---
IBM Zurich Research Laboratory,   Ph. +41 (1) 724-8329
Fax +41-1-724-8953; More info at www.semper.org/sirene
PGP Fingerprint    989AA3ED 21A19EF2 B0058374 BE0EE10D