- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 19:59:11 +0200
- To: public-p3p-spec <public-p3p-spec@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 06:17:23PM +0200, Rigo Wenning wrote: 1/ Task Force reports: A/ P3P beyond HTTP Patrick reported from his trip on Web Services. In conclusion he mentioned three important points: (1) Start to interact and communicate with W3C SOAP and WSDL working groups. I need help from Rigo and Hugo. (2) Draw and describe a diagram to demonstrate the importance of privacy technologies in a big picture. This is what I am now thinking... (3) Find more participants. In fact, I did try to invite some researchers involving into this task force. I did invite some researchers from Hitachi (Japan) and Virginia Tech (USA) to join us. Dicussion about further steps. Rigo reported from talk with Hugo Haas and Rigo will contact Philippe Le Hegaret. Action Rigo: Talk to HH and PLH and report back B/ Article 10 Meeting on 11 Sep was cancelled as Art. 29 WP wasn't ready yet. Giles sent a new document in. Diana will circulate this document at Art. 29 WP. C/ Converting data schemas Giles sent document to Rigo. Will be ready for review by the end of the week With new announcement. Rigo is actually doing edits and formatting of the document. Announcement will be sent to the list when the document is online. 2/ Discussion on elements postponed Continue discussion on the mailing-list. In absence of Dave Stampley, we postponed the discussion on http://www.w3.org/P3P/2003/p3p-translation.htm 3/ We discussed Rigo's primary purpose Rigo reported about his exchanges with IBM and that it still needs further discussion. They don't have a list of such primary purposes. Missing primary purposes was one of the disadvantages compared to short notices. Rigo asked Jeff to think about a list of some primary purposes in the financial industry, but not issuing it as an action item. Action item Rigo pending: Talk to IBM on primary purpose 4/ Giles: cookie is like a database identifier Jeff: whether use is intended or not, one has to declare. GH: doesn't have to be unique ID. It has the purpose to select a bunch of records in a database. Jeff: cases are sites with single sign-on etc and scope is not always clear. Has to be clarified what happens with the information, e.g. purpose. Jeff: also when converting to compact policy, it looses semantics and sounds more that the actual collection is. Action: Giles: Write some paragraphs about linked data and cookies. Action: Jeff: Write some paragraphs describing the issue. Talking about APPEL, there was no result from the P3P Event in Sydney. We might consider doing another meeting with JRC in Ispra/Italy 5/ Next call will be on 15 October 11am-12pm EDT Rigoscribe
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2003 13:59:16 UTC