- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 17:55:44 +0100
- To: public-p3p-spec <public-p3p-spec@w3.org>
Dear all,
on the 5 November call, we found that there is a close relationship
between disputes and remedies and changed the wording accordingly. Now
in <law /> under <Remedies> it says:
may be specified by the law referenced in the human readable
description.
But in the <Disputes> - Element, someone could write a statement like
this:
<DISPUTES-GROUP>
<DISPUTES resolution-type="law"
service="http://www.datenschutzzentrum.de/material/recht/ldsg-neu/ldsg-neu.htm"
short-description="State Data Protection Act Schleswig-Holstein">
<REMEDIES><law /></REMEDIES>
</DISPUTES>
</DISPUTES-GROUP>
In this case, the law is referenced automatically by the service-URI. In
this case, it doesn't make sense to go back to the human readable
policy, as required by the current definition.
So I propose to change that definition to:
Remedies for disputes arising in connection with the Privacy Statement
may be specified by the law referenced in service-URI.
Best,
Rigo
Received on Thursday, 27 November 2003 11:59:19 UTC