- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 18:09:49 +0100
- To: public-p3p-spec <public-p3p-spec@w3.org>
Present: Rigo Wenning Giles Hogben Brooks Dobbs Regrets: Jack Humphrey Jeff Edelen Patrick Hung 1/ Service definition in specification Rigo exposed the issue. Brooks and Giles agreed. Giles had questions about how the contact is made. resolution-type is service here, but there is also the service attribute indicating the URI of customer service. We decided to do the change. 2/ Discussion about agent relationsships Rigo introduced the question: in the same-entity proposal we distinguish between entity and agents. But the <ours /> definition says we and our agents: We concluded that the definition is not consistent. But it is too difficult to re-question the compromise found in P3P 1.0. But perhaps there are addtional classes of recipients missing. Giles is missing the sentence: "MUST not disclose the data to any non-declared recipient". to add to recipient-element. We concluded that we don't need same entity and agent proposal, but only one procedure. We postponed decision which one follow and expect more discussion on the mailing-list. Next call: 3 December 2003
Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2003 12:10:09 UTC