- From: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie@research.att.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 14:00:54 -0400
- To: public-p3p-spec@w3.org
Minutes of the 27 August 2003 P3P specification working group call Present: Lorrie Patrick Rigo Regrets: Ari Dave 1. Task force reports Patrick reported that the P3P beyond HTTP task force was working on trying to figure out what parts of their work should go in P3P 1.1. Rigo was concerned that the XML element binding stuff was not in the current draft. Rigo and Patrick will talk face-to-face in Sydney. Rigo will also try to get Marc L. involved. 2. Discussion of comments on P3P plain English translation -- see comments in red at http://www.w3.org/P3P/2003/p3p-translation.htm We discussed the remaining comments in red and propose the following changes. If anyone has any objections please raise them BEFORE next week's call and we will discuss further, otherwise these changes will be adopted. Change opturi from "Find out how to opt-out at" to "Find out how to opt-in or opt-out at" Change ACCESS=all from "We give you access to all of our information that identifies you" to "We give you access to all of our information identified with you" Change ACCESS=contact-and-other from "We give you access to your contact information and some of our other information that identifies you" to "We give you access to your contact information and some of our other information identified with you" Add "Customer service" as default wording for DISPUTES=service if site does not provide description Add "Independent organization" as default wording for DISPUTES=independent if site does not provide description Add "Legal complaint" as default wording in DISPUTES=court if site does not provide description Add "Law" as default wording in DISPUTES=law if site does not provide description Change PURPOSE=current from "For the purpose we indicated when you provided the information" to "To provide the service you requested" Change PURPOSE=individual-analysis from "To do research and analysis that uses information which identifies you" to "To do research and analysis that uses information about you" Change PURPOSE=individual-decision from "To make decisions that directly affect you, for example to recommend products or services based on your previous purchases" to "To make decisions that directly affect you using information about you, for example to recommend products or services based on your previous purchases" Note that we also discussed Deirdre's comment that RECIPIENTS=same does not make clear that the recipient might use the data for an unrelated purpose. However, we decided not to propose any changes to recipients as this element does not describe data usage. We will discuss the remaining comments (those in green) next week. 3 and 4. We could not discuss items 3 and 4 because Jeremy did not submit proposals and was not on the call. 5. Our next call will be on Wednesday, September 3. We will discuss disputes and remedies issues and Ari's identifiable/identified draft. We are still waiting for grouping proposal and documentation of performance issues from Jeremy.
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2003 13:59:37 UTC