- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:57:20 -0400
- To: Patrick.Hung@csiro.au, public-p3p-spec@w3.org
On Wednesday 23 April 2003 12:17, Patrick.Hung@csiro.au wrote:
> Thanks for your message, Joseph. Here are my comments.
BTW: without the ">" I have a hard time distinguishing your comments from
your context..
> I would expect that we may have to have P3P statements at both the HTTP
> (if applicable) and SOAP level. At the HTTP level, the P3P statements
> should work and behave the same as described in the original P3P
> Specification for the Web sites. At the SOAP level, the P3P statements
> should be on both general and application-oriented semantics (it may be
> hard). What do you think?
My inclination is that an application will specify which bindings its SOAP
is supported with. *If* this is the case, then I would RECOMMEND that it
define the SOAP statement as being inclusive of the SOAP interaction and
the binding.
> For your information, you can even send a SOAP message by a plain text
> e-mail message as long as the Web service can interpret e-mail message
> like those mailing list server (e.g., subscribe).
Yep, though I expect HTTP will be very common. (In fact, it was recently
reported that of Amazon's SOAP and REST (HTTP) interfaces, 85% of their
usage is of the REST interface.)
> Do we have a meeting call on April 30?
That's what the page says:
http://www.w3.org/P3P/Group/Specification/
Wednesday 30 April 2003 11am-12pm US Eastern/16:00-17:00 UTC
Dial-in number: Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200 Code: 73794 ("P3PWG")
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2003 13:57:25 UTC