- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 21:14:44 -0400
- To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@cs.ox.ac.uk>
- CC: "public-owl-wg@w3.org 2" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hmm. I don't see any diffs, colour coded or otherwise. I'm particularly looking at Section 14 of the functional syntax document, which I would have expected to be shown as a diff. peter On 09/13/2012 03:42 PM, Ian Horrocks wrote: > Dear All, > > Sorry for the long email -- but please do read as it is IMPORTANT. > > As anticipated when we published the OWL 2 Recommendation, members of the OWL Working Group have updated the various OWL 2 Recommendation documents to reflect the fact that the XML Schema Definition Language (XSD) 1.1 Part 2: Datatypes [1] is now a recommendation (as of 5 April 2012). At the same time, they have made minor corrections to address issues documented on the OWL 2 Errata page [2]. > > The resulting Editors' drafts (with color coded diffs) can be accessed via the OWL Working Group wiki: > > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/OWL_Working_Group#Drafts > > It is proposed to request publication of each of these documents. For the Recommendations, this will involve a round of AC Review as Proposed Edited Recommendations and publication as "Second Edition" Recommendations; the WG Notes will simply be updated in place. > > Can you please review the documents and complete the questionnaire at: > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/41712/second-edition/ > > saying if you approve this action, abstain or formally object. > > Regards, > Ian Horrocks > OWL Working Group Co-Chair > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-xmlschema11-2-20120405/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Errata > >
Received on Friday, 14 September 2012 01:15:15 UTC