- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 23:23:53 +0100
- To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@cs.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-owl-wg@w3.org, "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>, Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>
On 6 May 2012, at 23:19, Ian Horrocks wrote: > Hi Bijan (et al), > > According to my understanding, we agreed to keep the WG alive so that we could fix any OWL 2 problems caused by changes to XSD 1.1 Technically, a problem is that a useful datatype that was not workable in draft (xsd:duration) is now workable (in rec XSD 1.1). Thus, OWL no longer is complete with respect to the OWL workable WXS datatypes! Bijan "The Sophist" Parsia. P.S. I don't think this is really sophistry. RDF is screwing (sensibly) with datatypes. Harmonization between specs is a good idea in so far as is possible.
Received on Sunday, 6 May 2012 22:24:23 UTC