- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:36:12 -0400
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <schneid@fzi.de>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Michael - perhaps a less flippant answer would help - in moving to CR status (call for implementations) the Director discussed the pending objections and overruled them (you can see the decision in [1]) so only new objections raised during the CR would need to be addressed - since none were raised, the documents move forward - one should note, however, that AC members can, by process, bring up new problems not previously, and those would have to be dealt with - the strong technical components of this set of documents should help make that less likely. -JH [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2009AprJun/0062.html On Sep 22, 2009, at 4:08 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > Old objections never die, they just fade away. :-) > > peter > > > From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de> > Subject: So what about the pending formal objections? > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:07:50 -0500 > >> Hi! >> >> Now that our documents are PRs, what will happen to the two(?) formal >> objections? >> >> Cheers, >> Michael > We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard - John F. Kennedy, Sept 12, 1962 Prof James Hendler http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~hendler Tetherless World Constellation Chair & Asst Dean of IT and Web Science Computer and Cognitive Science Depts Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180 @jahendler, twitter
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:37:00 UTC