Re: preview drafts

This seems to be a weirdness of the transformation into XML -- in the  
wiki both use the same template and both appear italicised.

Ian


On 15 Sep 2009, at 16:24, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:

> Another minor editorial point:
>
> The references in the body of the text are sometimes in italic,  
> sometimes not. Both forms coexist even within the same paragraph. A  
> random example:
>
> Sect.2.2.5 of Profiles, 1st parag, [OWL 2 Specification] appears in  
> both forms in 2 consecutive sentences.
>
> I don't know if there is a rationale for that.
>
> AZ.
>
> Ian Horrocks wrote:
>> On 15 Sep 2009, at 12:06, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>>
>>> In Overview:
>>> - Sect.3, 2nd parag. a link labelled "Section 5.2" is pointing to  
>>> Sect.4.2 of NF&R.
>>> - References: while the URLs for OWL 2 documentations are  
>>> clickable, URLs for RDF Semantics, RDF Syntax and Turtle are not.  
>>> Is it intentional?
>> I don't understand this -- they seem to be clickable to me.
>>>
>>> General remarks:
>>> - contributors list: most of the links are pointing towards the  
>>> wiki, which usually contains only one link to their homepages.  
>>> But this is not consistent across the documents (sometimes link  
>>> to the wiki user page, sometimes to the homepage);
>> I will try to fix this.
>>> + Mike Smith is identified as Michael Smith in Conformance, while  
>>> he is identified as Mike Smith in SS&FSS.
>> I'll check.
>> Ian
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> AZ
>>>
>>>
>>> Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>>> I'm cautiously optimistic that we'll finally be able to publish  
>>>> on Sept
>>>> 24, with a 4-week comment deadline, making it possible we can  
>>>> advance to
>>>> REC before or during ISWC.
>>>> I've prepared preview drafts, linked from:
>>>>    http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/owl2-overview/ 
>>>> #Documentation_Roadmap
>>>> As usual, please look at the color coded diff to make sure the  
>>>> change
>>>> description is accurate, and look at the diff from the wiki  
>>>> text, to
>>>> make sure the publication script didn't mess anything up.  The  
>>>> diff from
>>>> wiki is named like:
>>>>    http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/owl2-overview/diff-from- 
>>>> original
>>>> Current issues:
>>>>   - the "Please Comment By" text needs some work (marked with a  
>>>> TBD)
>>>>   - NFR has a broken internal link to ref-owl-2-manchester-syntax
>>>>   - XML has two broken internal links: ref-register-mime and
>>>>     ref-mime-consistency
>>>> We're still working on the XSD dependency issue, but otherwise I  
>>>> think
>>>> we're in pretty good shape.    I wonder what we're forgetting?  :-)
>>>>       -- Sandro
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Antoine Zimmermann
>>> Post-doctoral researcher at:
>>> Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>> National University of Ireland, Galway
>>> IDA Business Park
>>> Lower Dangan
>>> Galway, Ireland
>>> antoine.zimmermann@deri.org
>>> http://vmgal34.deri.ie/~antzim/
>>>
>
>
> -- 
> Antoine Zimmermann
> Post-doctoral researcher at:
> Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> National University of Ireland, Galway
> IDA Business Park
> Lower Dangan
> Galway, Ireland
> antoine.zimmermann@deri.org
> http://vmgal34.deri.ie/~antzim/

Received on Tuesday, 15 September 2009 16:03:43 UTC