- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:03:30 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>, Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, public-owl-wg@w3.org, ij@w3.org
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: > >> Yes, and with the color, of course! ;-) > > I see your point. The example I was working from was: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS1/ > > which I really didn't like. > > I've made a new version with a softer color and with softer wording, > trying to avoid any sense that there is something wrong with OWL 1. See: > > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/owl-features-revised2.html > > Good enough? I like this color better; but re: wording, why not the neutral "OWL specifications have been revised; see OWL 2 blah blah". Cheers, Kendall
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 22:04:26 UTC