- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:16:05 -0400
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
When people visit the OWL 1 recommendations like Overview http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/ Semantics and Abstract Syntax http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/ etc ... perhaps we'd like them be told, somehow, that OWL 2 exists. The best plan I've heard is to insert a note in those 2004 Recommendations telling people about the 2009 ones. It would look something like this mockup I made: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/owl-features-revised.html Other options include: - do nothing; people can find OWL 2 on their own - make the "latest version" URLs (which I used above) point instead to something else. owl-features could point to owl2-overview, and owl2-overview could have TWO "Previous Version" URLS, one for the OWL 1 Recommendation, one for the OWL 2 Proposed Recommendation. The big problem with this is that for some documents, it's not clear what they would be updated to point to, since some OWL 1 documents (like owl-semantics) are not replaced by exactly one document in OWL 2, or are not replaced at all (webont-req). Also, this URL cleverness can get pretty confusing. The people I've talked to, after some thought, seem to favor the inserted-note approach. It's unusual for W3C, but it has been done before, and I think we can probably do it this time. If anyone in the WG has strong opinions on this, please speak up now. -- Sandro
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 20:16:15 UTC