- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:16:05 -0400
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
When people visit the OWL 1 recommendations like
Overview
http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
Semantics and Abstract Syntax
http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/
etc
... perhaps we'd like them be told, somehow, that OWL 2 exists. The
best plan I've heard is to insert a note in those 2004 Recommendations
telling people about the 2009 ones. It would look something like this
mockup I made:
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/owl-features-revised.html
Other options include:
- do nothing; people can find OWL 2 on their own
- make the "latest version" URLs (which I used above) point instead
to something else. owl-features could point to owl2-overview, and
owl2-overview could have TWO "Previous Version" URLS, one for the
OWL 1 Recommendation, one for the OWL 2 Proposed Recommendation.
The big problem with this is that for some documents, it's not
clear what they would be updated to point to, since some OWL 1
documents (like owl-semantics) are not replaced by exactly one
document in OWL 2, or are not replaced at all (webont-req). Also,
this URL cleverness can get pretty confusing.
The people I've talked to, after some thought, seem to favor the
inserted-note approach. It's unusual for W3C, but it has been done
before, and I think we can probably do it this time.
If anyone in the WG has strong opinions on this, please speak up now.
-- Sandro
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 20:16:15 UTC