- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:29:18 -0400
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
I'm still cautiously optimistic that we'll make it to Rec on Thursday.
In line with that possibility, I've put drafts in place:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-overview-20091022/
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-syntax-20091022/
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-mapping-to-rdf-20091022/
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-direct-semantics-20091022/
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-rdf-based-semantics-20091022/
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-conformance-20091022/
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-profiles-20091022/
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-primer-20091022/
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-new-features-20091022/
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-quick-reference-20091022/
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-xml-serialization-20091022/
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-owl2-manchester-syntax-20091022/
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-owl2-dr-linear-20091022/
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-rdf-plain-literal-20091022/
Please take a look, and be even more careful about any changes from now
on. (I haven't yet run all the machine checks on the these documents
because most of the relevant w3.org services are currently down.)
-- Sandro
Received on Monday, 19 October 2009 04:29:25 UTC