- From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:14:18 +0200
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Yes, agreed... we use Turtle throughout all documents. Rinke On 14 okt 2009, at 11:41, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > Hmm. > > I think that Turtle would be better than N3, as the status of the > Turtle > syntax is better than the status of the N3 syntax. > > peter > > > From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl> > Subject: Re: OWL 2 Quick Reference Card > Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:32:27 -0500 > >> Hi Jie, >> >> A minor issue: "RDF Syntax" should be "Turtle" (or N3)... as an RDF >> syntax as such does not exist. >> >> Rinke >> >> On 14 okt 2009, at 02:41, Jie Bao wrote: >> >>> The card is offered in two sizes: A4 and Letter (8.5x11 inch) - see >>> attachment >>> >>> Please comment if you have any issue with the content, layout, pdf >>> file, printing, etc. >>> >>> We need to put them on the PR page soon. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Jie >>> >>> ----- >>> Jie Bao >>> http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie >>> <2009-10-06_OWLqrg-Letter.pdf><2009-10-06_OWLqrg-A4.pdf> >> >>
Received on Wednesday, 14 October 2009 11:14:48 UTC