- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 21:02:57 +0100
- To: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
I am surprised and disappointed to note that, to date, only two members of the WG appear to have voted regarding the publication of our documents as W3C Recommendations. I would have expected that members of the WG would at least have an opinion! Regards, Ian Begin forwarded message: > Resent-From: public-owl-wg@w3.org > From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> > Date: 28 September 2009 12:45:07 BDT > To: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org> > Subject: OWL 2 Call for Review > > Sorry if this is obvious to you, but it didn't seem very obvious to > me. > > There is a questionnaire at [1] that asks AC members to "indicate > whether you endorse [the OWL 2 specs] as W3C Recommendations". I > assume that (most) members of the WG support the advancement of OWL > to Recommendation and so will want to ask their AC reps to complete > the questionnaire accordingly! > > Thanks, > Ian > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/owl2_pr/ >
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:03:30 UTC