Tuesday, 31 March 2009
- Review of Manchester Syntax Document
- Minutes for TC 2008-03-25
- Moving towards 2nd Last Call
- RE: I've implemented the changes to xsd:dateTimeStamp
- Agenda TC 01/04/2009
- Re: I've implemented the changes to xsd:dateTimeStamp
- Re: RDF-Based Semantics ready for WG-internal Review
- Review of the RDF based semantics document (CLOSE ACTION-316)
- Re: Acknowlegment glitch
- RE: RDF-Based Semantics ready for WG-internal Review
- Acknowlegment glitch
- XML Syntax updated
- RE: RDF-Based Semantics ready for WG-internal Review
Monday, 30 March 2009
- general review of NF&R
- Re: Quick comments on the QRG
- Re: Quick comments on the QRG
- Re: Quick comments on the QRG
- Re: review of rdf:text
- review of rdf:text
- review of Document Overview
- Re: Quick comments on the QRG
- review of RDF-Based Semantics
- RE: I've implemented the changes to xsd:dateTimeStamp
- review of RDF-Based Semantics
- Re: I've implemented the changes to xsd:dateTimeStamp
- RE: I've implemented the changes to xsd:dateTimeStamp
- Re: I've implemented the changes to xsd:dateTimeStamp
- Re: Review of the Syntax document (action 312)
- Re: Review of the Syntax document (action 312)
- Re: RDF-Based Semantics ready for WG-internal Review
- RE: Review of the Syntax document (action 312)
- Re: Review of the Syntax document (action 312)
- Re: RDF-Based Semantics ready for WG-internal Review
Sunday, 29 March 2009
- RDF-Based Semantics ready for WG-internal Review
- DAYLIGHT SAVING TIME
- Re: Review of the Syntax document (action 312)
- RE: Review of the Syntax document (action 312)
- Recommend suffixes and mimetype
Saturday, 28 March 2009
- I've implemented the changes to xsd:dateTimeStamp
- RE: I've just replaced CURIEs with the SPARQL abbreviation mechanism
- I've just replaced CURIEs with the SPARQL abbreviation mechanism
- Re: Review of QRG (Action 307)
- Re: Review of QRG (Action 307)
Friday, 27 March 2009
- RE: order of editors in Overview references
- Re: Review of QRG (Action 307)
- order of editors in Overview references
- Re: Review of QRG (Action 307)
- Re: Review of QRG (Action 307)
- Re: Review of QRG (Action 307)
- Re: Review of QRG (Action 307)
- Re: Review of QRG (Action 307)
- Re: Review of QRG (Action 307)
- Re: Document Overview published
- Review of the Syntax document (action 312)
- Re: Document Overview published
- Document Overview published
- Re: Review of QRG (Action 307)
Thursday, 26 March 2009
- 13th European Conference on Digital Libraries - Submission Deadline Reminder
- ?Double affilation
- A number of changes in rdf:text
Wednesday, 25 March 2009
- RE: OWL naming issues
- [LC Response] To Alan Ruttenberg Re: Last call comment - conformance/datatype map
- Re: Preliminary Review of "Conformance and Test Cases" (as of 20 March 2009)
- Re: OWL naming issues
- Drafted response to LC-Comment 52a (JR6a)
- Review of QRG (Action 307)
- Re: keys and format
- Re: keys and format
- Re: OWL naming issues
Tuesday, 24 March 2009
- Re: draft response for 52b / JR6b
- RE: draft response for 52b / JR6b
- Re: OWL naming issues
- Re: ACTION-308 Review QRG
- Re: ACTION-308 Review QRG
- Agenda TC 25/03/2009
- OWL naming issues
- Re: PROPOSAL: CHANGES for CURIEs
- Re: Determining the type of an IRI for OWL 2 Full represented in structural specification
- Re: Preliminary Review of "Conformance and Test Cases" (as of 20 March 2009)
Monday, 23 March 2009
- PROPOSAL: CHANGES for CURIEs
- Re: draft response for 52b / JR6b
- Re: syntax/semantics confusion in 'Syntax' document
- syntax/semantics confusion in 'Syntax' document
- Determining the type of an IRI for OWL 2 Full represented in structural specification
- RE: Suggestion to change RDF encoding of HasKey axioms [RE: I've implemented the change to the syntax of HasKey]
- Re: CURIEs (was Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax)
- Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments)
- ACTION-308 Review QRG
- Re: [LC response] To Jonathan Rees -- a proposal for responding to Johnatan's latest comments
- Re: CURIEs (was Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax)
- Re: CURIEs (was Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax)
- Re: [PROPOSAL] CURIES in OWL/XML
- [PROPOSAL] CURIES in OWL/XML
- Re: CURIEs (was Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax)
- Re: CURIEs (was Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax)
- Re: CURIEs (was Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax)
- Re: CURIEs (was Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax)
- CURIEs (was Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax)
Sunday, 22 March 2009
- Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax
- Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax
- Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax
- Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax
- RE: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax
- Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax
- RE: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax
- RE: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax
- Re: [LC response] To Jonathan Rees -- a proposal for responding to Johnatan's latest comments
- Re: Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax
Saturday, 21 March 2009
- Several minor problems in the grammar for the functional-style syntax
- RE: [LC response] To Jonathan Rees -- a proposal for responding to Johnatan's latest comments
- Re: Suggestion to change RDF encoding of HasKey axioms [RE: I've implemented the change to the syntax of HasKey]
- RE: Suggestion to change RDF encoding of HasKey axioms [RE: I've implemented the change to the syntax of HasKey]
- Re: Suggestion to change RDF encoding of HasKey axioms [RE: I've implemented the change to the syntax of HasKey]
- RE: Suggestion to change RDF encoding of HasKey axioms [RE: I've implemented the change to the syntax of HasKey]
- Re 2: Suggestion to change RDF encoding of HasKey axioms [RE: I've implemented the change to the syntax of HasKey]
- Re: Suggestion to change RDF encoding of HasKey axioms [RE: I've implemented the change to the syntax of HasKey]
Friday, 20 March 2009
- Re: Preliminary Review of "Conformance and Test Cases" (as of 20 March 2009)
- Re: Preliminary Review of "Conformance and Test Cases" (as of 20 March 2009)
- Suggestion to change RDF encoding of HasKey axioms [RE: I've implemented the change to the syntax of HasKey]
- Re: GRRDL notes
- Re: GRRDL notes
- Re: A Last Call comment about the seamtnics of xsd:dateTimeStamp in OWL 2 (caused by the yesterday's decision about numerics)
- Preliminary Review of "Conformance and Test Cases" (as of 20 March 2009)
- GRRDL notes
- I've implemented the change to the syntax of HasKey
- Re: Versions and Imports in NF&R, and syntactic stuff.
- Versions and Imports in NF&R, and syntactic stuff.
- Re: NF&R update
- Re: NF&R update
- Re: Jan Wielemaker is o.k. I think
- Re: NF&R update
- Re: Jan Wielemaker is o.k. I think
- Re: LC comments 18, 19, 59
Thursday, 19 March 2009
- Re: NF&R and OWL 1 use cases
- Re: scribe conventions
- Re: NF&R and OWL 1 use cases
- Re: Jan Wielemaker is o.k. I think
- Re: [LC Response] To Zhe Wu Re: OWL 2 LC Comments
- Re: Reference to Document Overview in LC responses
- RE: Jan Wielemaker is o.k. I think
- Re: Jan Wielemaker is o.k. I think
- Re: Jan Wielemaker is o.k. I think
- Re: Jan Wielemaker is o.k. I think
- Re: Jan Wielemaker is o.k. I think
- Re: LC comments 18, 19, 59
- Jan Wielemaker is o.k. I think
- Re: new draft response for LC comment 66 AR1
- Re: [LC response] To Guus Schreiber
- Re: [LC response] To Guus Schreiber
- RE: A problem with HasKey in the functional-style syntax
- Thanks to Bernardo for scribing
- Re: A problem with HasKey in the functional-style syntax
- RE: A problem with HasKey in the functional-style syntax
- Re: A problem with HasKey in the functional-style syntax
- Re: New XML Schema is in the Wiki
Wednesday, 18 March 2009
- Re: [LC Response] To Zhe Wu Re: OWL 2 LC Comments - Addendum
- RE: A problem with HasKey in the functional-style syntax
- RE: [LC Response] To Michael Schneider Re: Declaration( Datatype( DT ) )
- RE: A problem with HasKey in the functional-style syntax
- New XML Schema is in the Wiki
- Re: [LC Response] To Zhe Wu Re: OWL 2 LC Comments
- [LC Response] To Zhe Wu Re: OWL 2 LC Comments - Addendum
- [LC Response] To Michael Schneider Re: Declaration( Datatype( DT ) )
- A problem with HasKey in the functional-style syntax
- Re: NF&R update
- scribe conventions
- Re: new draft response for LC comment 66 AR1
- Re: Changes to the spec that were decided at the F2F are done
- Re: new draft response for LC comment 66 AR1
- Re: LC comments 18, 19, 59
- Re: new draft response for LC comment 66 AR1
- Re: new draft response for LC comment 66 AR1
- Re: LC comments 18, 19, 59
- Re: JM1 response in today's agenda
- ECDL 2009 - Submission Deadline Extension
- Re: Datatype disjointness implemented
- NF&R and OWL 1 use cases
- Reference to Document Overview in LC responses
- JM1 response in today's agenda
- Re: Agenda TC 18/03/2009
- Re: Agenda TC 18/03/2009
- Re: A Last Call comment about the seamtnics of xsd:dateTimeStamp in OWL 2 (caused by the yesterday's decision about numerics)
- Re: Datatype disjointness implemented
- Re: MSM1, RIF1
- Re: MSM1, RIF1
- keys and format
- Re: MSM1, RIF1
- Re: NF&R update
- Re: response to FH3
- Re: MSM1, RIF1
- Re: new draft response for LC comment 66 AR1
- response to FH3
- MSM1, RIF1
- NF&R update
- Re: LC comments 18, 19, 59
- Re: LC comments 18, 19, 59
- Re: Comment on NF&R Applicability of Use Case References
Tuesday, 17 March 2009
- Re: LC comments 18, 19, 59
- Fwd: LC comments 18, 19, 59
- Re: Proposal for use of labels in Manchester Syntax ISSUE-146, ACTION-247
- Re: Closing action-306: Comments on the QRG
- Quick comments on the QRG
- Re: Closing action-306: Comments on the QRG
- Re: Closing action-306: Comments on the QRG
- Agenda TC 18/03/2009
- Re: Closing action-306: Comments on the QRG
- Re: Closing action-306: Comments on the QRG
- Re: Closing action-306: Comments on the QRG
- Re: Closing action-306: Comments on the QRG
- Float and Double in OWL RL
- Closing action-306: Comments on the QRG
- Re: draft response for LC comment 20 JDB1
- RE: A Last Call comment about the seamtnics of xsd:dateTimeStamp in OWL 2 (caused by the yesterday's decision about numerics)
- Re: draft response for LC comment 20 JDB1
- Re: ambiguity in XML Schema
- Action 309: Review of QR document
- Re: draft response for LC comment 20 JDB1
- RE: ambiguity in XML Schema
- Re: ambiguity in XML Schema
- Re: ambiguity in XML Schema
- Re: ambiguity in XML Schema
- ambiguity in XML Schema
- Re: A Last Call comment about the seamtnics of xsd:dateTimeStamp in OWL 2 (caused by the yesterday's decision about numerics)
- Re: draft response to LC comment 60/JC2
- Re: draft response for LC comment 20 JDB1
- Re: Response to Andy Seaborne's comments on rdf:text
- Re: Datatype disjointness implemented
Monday, 16 March 2009
- Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58
- Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58
- Re: new draft LC response for 62
- RE: would a semantics by any other name look as formal?
- RE: Response to Andy Seaborne's comments on rdf:text
- FYI: started to draft answer to LC 52a
- Re: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1
- Re: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1
- Fwd: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1
- Re: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1
- Re: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1
- Re: draft response for LC comment 20 JDB1
- Re: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1
- Re: draft response to LC comment 60/JC2
- Re: draft response for LC comment 20 JDB1
- Re: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1
- Re: draft response to LC comment 60/JC2
- ECDL 2009 Final Call for Papers / Submission System now Available
- Missing "." at end of last sentence in "Acknowledgements" section
- RE: Datatype definitions implemented
- RE: Changes to the spec that were decided at the F2F are done
- Re: Datatype disjointness implemented
- Re: Datatype disjointness implemented
- Re: Datatype disjointness implemented
- Re: changes to document overview (done)
- Re: Datatype disjointness implemented
Sunday, 15 March 2009
- Re: draft response to LC 58 concerning OWL Full [RE: FYI - unresolved LC Comments]
- Re: completed draft response for LC comment 21 JDB2
- Re: US / UK dialect in OWL docs
- Re: changes to document overview (done)
- Re: Comment on NF&R Applicability of Use Case References
- Re: Comment on NF&R Appendix: Use Cases - Literature v. References
- Re: proposed changes to Document Overview
- Re: proposed changes to Document Overview
- Re: draft response for LC comment 64 MS7
- Re: unhappy responses
Saturday, 14 March 2009
- Re: CURIEs in OWL/XML
- Responses drafted for the comments by Jonathan Rees (numbers 33 and 44)
- Re: CURIEs in OWL/XML
- CURIEs in OWL/XML
Friday, 13 March 2009
- would a semantics by any other name look as formal?
- new draft response for LC comment 66 AR1
- Changes to the spec that were decided at the F2F are done
- Datatype definitions implemented
- proposal for bibliography handling
- Re: [LC response] To Ivan Herman
- Re: A Last Call comment about the seamtnics of xsd:dateTimeStamp in OWL 2 (caused by the yesterday's decision about numerics)
- Re: Draft second response for LC Comment 51a RM1-2
- [LC response] To Ivan Herman
- Re: Draft second response for LC Comment 51a RM1-2
- RE: Datatype disjointness implemented
Thursday, 12 March 2009
- Re: Datatype disjointness implemented
- RE: Draft second response for LC Comment 51a RM1-2
- abstract of NF&R
- Re: Datatype disjointness implemented
- Draft second response for LC Comment 51a RM1-2
- RE: LC responses 28, 48 & 58
- RE: draft response for LC comment 8 MS2
- Re: Draft Response for LC Comment 22 MSM1
- RE: Proposed response to LC call 12 (Theorem PR1)
- draft response to LC 58 concerning OWL Full [RE: FYI - unresolved LC Comments]
- Re: Draft Response for LC Comment 22 MSM1
- RE: completed draft response for LC comment 21 JDB2
- Re: Datatype disjointness implemented
- Proposed response to LC call 12 (Theorem PR1)
- Proposed response to LC call 12 (Theorem PR1)
- FYI - unresolved LC Comments
- response for 21 JDB2 (was Re: GIF in W3C documents )
- Re: Draft Response for LC Comment 22 MSM1
- Re: draft response for LC comment 8 MS2
- Re: draft responses for LC comments JC1a and JC1b/34 et al
- RE: draft response for LC comment 8 MS2
- Re: draft response for LC comment 66 AR1
- Re: Datatype disjointness implemented
- RE: Datatype disjointness implemented
- A Last Call comment about the seamtnics of xsd:dateTimeStamp in OWL 2 (caused by the yesterday's decision about numerics)
- RE: Datatype disjointness implemented
- Re: draft response for LC comment 66 AR1
- RE: draft response for 52b / JR6b
- Datatype disjointness implemented
- RE: links to bibliography
- Re: US / UK dialect in OWL docs
- Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58
- Re: draft response for 52b / JR6b
- Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58
- Re: draft response for LC comment 24 RIF1
- Re: Draft Response for LC Comment 22 MSM1
- Re: new draft LC response for 62
- Re: draft response for 52b / JR6b
- Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58
- Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54
- Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58
- Re: GIF in W3C documents
- lack of progress on LC responses
- Re: GIF in W3C documents
- completed draft response for LC comment 21 JDB2
Wednesday, 11 March 2009
- GIF in W3C documents
- Draft Response for LC Comment 22 MSM1
- draft response for LC comment 24 RIF1
- Re: draft response for LC comment 8 MS2
- Re: links to bibliography
- Re: links to bibliography
- RE: draft response for LC comment 65 MS8
- new draft LC response for 62
- Re: draft response for LC comment 65 MS8
- new draft LC response for 51b
- Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58
- Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58
- Re: draft response for 52b / JR6b
- draft response for 52b / JR6b
- Re: links to bibliography
- Minutes for TC 2008-03-11
- Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54
- Comment on NF&R Applicability of Use Case References
- Re: review of document-overview
- Comment on NF&R Appendix: Use Cases - Literature v. References
- Re: review of document-overview
- Re: changes to document overview (done)
- Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58
- Re: review of document-overview
- Re: changes to document overview (done)
- Re: review of document-overview
- Re: changes to document overview (done)
- Re: changes to document overview (done)
- Re: changes to document overview (done)
- Re: proposed changes to Document Overview
- Re: changes to document overview (done)
- Re: review of document-overview
- Re: proposed changes to Document Overview
- Re: changes to document overview (done)
- ACTION-283 completed: tests modified, drafted content for errata
- Re: changes to document overview (done)
- Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54
- RE: LC responses 28, 48 & 58
- Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54
- Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54
- Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54
- Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54
- Re: review of document-overview
- links to bibliography
- changes to document overview (done)
- Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58
- how we refer to SSFSS (not urgent)
- Re: US / UK dialect in OWL docs
- Re: draft response for LC comment 64 MS7
- proposed changes to Document Overview
- Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58
Tuesday, 10 March 2009
- RE: draft response for LC comment 64 MS7
- Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54
- RE: LC responses 28, 48 & 58
- Re: review of document-overview
- Re: Agenda for TC 2009-03-11 - Note meeting 1 hour earlier than usual in Europe due to daylight saving time differences
- Re: Agenda for TC 2009-03-11 - Note meeting 1 hour earlier than usual in Europe due to daylight saving time differences
- Re: Agenda for TC 2008-03-11 - Note meeting 1 hour earlier than usual in Europe due to daylight saving time differences
- Agenda for TC 2008-03-11 - Note meeting 1 hour earlier than usual in Europe due to daylight saving time differences
- Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54
- Re: review of document-overview
- Re: review of document-overview
- Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54
- agenda for TC 11 March 2009 - NOTE TIME CHANGE IN Europe!!!
- Re: review of document-overview
- For those of you not on owl-dev
- Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54
- Re: review of document-overview
- Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54
- Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54
- Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54
- Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54
- Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54
- Re: review of document-overview
- Re: review of document-overview
- Re: review of document-overview
- Re: Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54 (was draft responses for LC comment FH3/29)
- US / UK dialect in OWL docs
- Response draft for Jan Wielemaker JR8-2/54 (was draft responses for LC comment FH3/29)
- Re: review of document-overview
- Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29
- Re: review of document-overview
- review of document-overview
Monday, 9 March 2009
- RE: unhappy responses
- RE: draft response for LC comment 8 MS2
- Re: unhappy responses
- Re: unhappy responses
- RE: CURIE is a rec
- Updated XML Schema
- Re: a different approach to OWL/XML (was: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29)
- a different approach to OWL/XML (was: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29)
- Re: normative and non-normative references
- RE: normative and non-normative references
- Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29
- Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29
- Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29
- Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29
- Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29
- Re: normative and non-normative references
- Re: normative and non-normative references
- RE: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29
- Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29
- Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29
- Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29
- Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29
- Re: normative and non-normative references
- Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29
- RE: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29
- RE: normative and non-normative references
- Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29
- Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29
- Re: LC responses 28, 48 & 58
- Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29
- Re: A description of the changes necessary to implement named data ranges
- Re: CURIE is a rec
Sunday, 8 March 2009
Saturday, 7 March 2009
- LC responses 28, 48 & 58
- Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document
- Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document
- Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document
- Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document
- Re: CURIE is a rec
- Re: normative and non-normative references
Friday, 6 March 2009
- Re: normative and non-normative references
- RE: normative and non-normative references
- normative and non-normative references
- CURIE is a rec
- Re: draft responses for LC comments JC1a and JC1b/34 et al
- Re: draft responses for LC comment FH3/29
- draft responses for LC comments JC1a and JC1b/34 et al
- draft responses for LC comment FH3/29
- Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document
- Re: NF&R input
- Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document
- Re: Wiki madness
- Re: unhappy responses
- Re: unhappy responses
- Re: A description of the changes necessary to implement named data ranges
- Re: [LC Response] To Ralf Moeller Re: OWL2
- LC comment 51/1: unsatisfied with our response
- Fwd: [LC Response] To Ralf Moeller Re: OWL2
- Some trivial errors fixed in Document Overview and Roadmap
- Re: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1
- Re: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1
- RE: draft response for LC comment 65 MS8
- Re: New responses ready to go [for Agenda TC 11/03/2009]
- RE: A description of the changes necessary to implement named data ranges
- Re: Wiki madness
- RE: OWL2 comments -> UC#3
- Re: unhappy responses
- Re: A description of the changes necessary to implement named data ranges
- NF&R input
- Re: OWL2 comments -> UC#3
Thursday, 5 March 2009
- Re: OWL2 comments -> UC#3
- Re: A description of the changes necessary to implement named data ranges
- RE: unhappy responses
- Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document
- Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document
- Unresponsive commenters
- Re: unhappy responses
- Re: unhappy responses
- Re: unhappy responses
- Re: unhappy responses
- Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document
- Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document
- Re: The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document
- Re: unhappy responses
- Re: unhappy responses
- Re: unhappy responses
- Manchester syntax updated for datatype definitions
- Re: A description of the changes necessary to implement named data ranges
- A description of the changes necessary to implement named data ranges
- Re: unhappy responses
- RE: unhappy responses
- Wiki madness
- Re: draft response to LC comment 60/JC2
- unhappy responses
- Re: draft response for LC comment 64 MS7
- draft response to LC comment 60/JC2
- draft response for LC comment 64 MS7
- Re: [LC Response] To Ivan Herman Re: tiny editorial comment
- draft response for LC comment 65 MS8
- ACTION-301 Contact Andy Seaborn
- Re: Response to Andy Seaborne's comments on rdf:text
- Re: [LC Response] To Zhe Wu Re: OWL 2 LC Comments
Wednesday, 4 March 2009
- [LC Response] To Ivan Herman Re: tiny editorial comment
- RE: partial response for LC comment 21 JDB2
- New responses ready to go [for Agenda TC 11/03/2009]
- Re: [LC Response] To Zhe Wu Re: OWL 2 LC Comments
- [LC Response] To Zhe Wu Re: OWL 2 LC Comments
- [LC Response] To Zhe Wu Re: OWL 2 LC Comments
- Re: [LC Comment] To Bijan Parsia Re: LC Comment: "Hidden" Axioms
- [LC Comment] To Bijan Parsia Re: LC Comment: "Hidden" Axioms
- "comment" on XSD 1.1 Part 2: Datatypes
- Re: Draft for the response to LC comment 58 (fully typed functional-style syntax)
- Re: Draft for the response to LC comment 58 (fully typed functional-style syntax)
- The issue of syntax productions within the NF&R document
- 13th European Conference on Digital Libraries - Second Call for Special Tracks
- Re: Draft for the response to LC comment 58 (fully typed functional-style syntax)
- Re: draft response for LC comment 63 JO1
- Re: Draft for the response to LC comment 58 (fully typed functional-style syntax)
- Re: Draft for the response to LC comment 58 (fully typed functional-style syntax)
- draft response for LC comment 63 JO1
- Re: draft response for LC comment 8 MS2
- Re: partial response for LC comment 21 JDB2
- draft response for LC comment 66 AR1
- draft response for LC comment 20 JDB1
Tuesday, 3 March 2009
- RE: partial response for LC comment 21 JDB2
- Re: draft response for LC comment 51 RM1 and 62 JM1
- Re: draft response for LC comment 51 RM1 and 62 JM1
- Re: draft response for LC comment 51 RM1 and 62 JM1
- Re: draft response for LC comment 51 RM1 and 62 JM1
- Agenda TC 04/03/2009
- Re: OWL2 comments -> UC#3
- Re: OWL2 comments -> UC#3
- Re: [Fwd: US clocks move to Summer Time Sunday, 8 March]
- [Fwd: US clocks move to Summer Time Sunday, 8 March]
- Re: draft response for 43b ZW3b
- Re: Draft Response to LC comment 49/JR4
- Re: Implemented Resolution of LC Comment 34 (TQ) on property chains in RDF-Based Semantics
- Re: OWL2 comments -> UC#3
- Re: OWL2 comments -> UC#3
Monday, 2 March 2009
- Re: OWL2 comments -> UC#3
- Re: Implemented Resolution of LC Comment 34 (TQ) on property chains in RDF-Based Semantics
- Re: Implemented Resolution on LC-Comment 16 ("lexical value") in RDF-Based Semantics
- RE: Implemented Resolution of LC Comment 34 (TQ) on property chains in RDF-Based Semantics
- Re: Implemented Resolution of LC Comment 34 (TQ) on property chains in RDF-Based Semantics
- Re: OWL2 comments -> UC#3
- Re: OWL2 comments -> UC#3
- Re: draft response for 43b ZW3b
- Re: draft response for LC comment 32 CO1
- Re: Draft response to LC comment 46
- Re: draft response for LC comment 25 RIF2
- Re: draft response for 43b ZW3b
- Draft Response to LC comment 49/JR4
- Re: Draft Response to LC comment 42/AS1
- Re: OWL2 comments -> UC#3