Re: OWL dot OWL file

I agree with Peter. Given the very late stage of proceedings, can we  
please keep changes (w.r.t. owl.owl) to an absolute minimum.

Ian


On 24 Jul 2009, at 13:39, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

> I have no major difficulties with such changes, except that every time
> something is added - even an rdfs:comment - there is another chance to
> have something go wrong.  To me, this argues very strongly for not
> adding anything, and perhaps even going back to just including the
> typing, domain, and range stuff.
>
> peter
>
>
>
> From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
> Subject: RE: OWL dot OWL file
> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 02:52:07 -0500
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Triggered by a mail of Holger (thanks to Holger for finding the
>> "rdf:ObjectProperty" bug!), I have tried to bring the form of  
>> owl2.owl a bit
>> more in line with the other files rdf.rdf and rdfs.rdfs (no  
>> changes to the
>> relevant triples). Effects:
>>
>> * Slight changes to how the rdfs:commentS are written.
>> * rdfs:seeAlso Links for each term.
>> * A dc:title for the ontology header
>>
>> I have also checked through the comments and refined some of them,  
>> and most
>> of them look now pretty acceptable to me, but a few seem still  
>> discussible.
>>
>> One thing that should probably be mentioned: I have extended the  
>> comment for
>> owl:DataRange by a note that it is deprecated (exactly the same  
>> note that is
>> used in the RDF-Based Semantics). Is someone unhappy with this?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Michael
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg- 
>>> request@w3.org]
>>> On Behalf Of Michael Schneider
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 11:57 AM
>>> To: Ian Horrocks
>>> Cc: W3C OWL Working Group
>>> Subject: RE: OWL dot OWL file
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I have created a Wiki page containing my current proposal for  
>>> owl2.owl
>>> (_not_ for the whole set OWL 2 axiomatic triples), so we can  
>>> better work
>>> on
>>> it:
>>>
>>>  <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Owl2DotOwlDevel>
>>>
>>> There are links to some of the mails so far, and a lot of open
>>> questions,
>>> and some TODOs.
>>>
>>> I have copy&pasted the ontology header from owl.owl, and started to
>>> update
>>> it, but there are several open points. In particular, the header  
>>> comment
>>> probably needs more brains to think about it. For a start, I have
>>> included
>>> some (not all :)) of Peter's yesterday's comments to it, but  
>>> please...
>>> comment!
>>>
>>> I have also added labels in the owl.owl style to every term, and  
>>> even a
>>> preliminary rdfs:comment (as recently asked for by Holger), but the
>>> comments
>>> are in several cases probably not so good yet, maybe even  
>>> inadequate.
>>> Maybe
>>> others have a look at them (I will have a look myself, when I have a
>>> little
>>> more time for this).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Michael
>>
>> --
>> Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider
>> Research Scientist, Dept. Information Process Engineering (IPE)
>> Tel  : +49-721-9654-726
>> Fax  : +49-721-9654-727
>> Email: michael.schneider@fzi.de
>> WWW  : http://www.fzi.de/michael.schneider
>> ===================================================================== 
>> ==
>> FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe
>> Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe
>> Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959
>> Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts, Az 14-0563.1, RP Karlsruhe
>> Vorstand: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rüdiger Dillmann, Dipl. Wi.-Ing. Michael  
>> Flor,
>> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Wolffried Stucky, Prof. Dr. Rudi Studer
>> Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus
>> ===================================================================== 
>> ==
>>

Received on Sunday, 26 July 2009 09:46:56 UTC