- From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:52:07 +0200
- To: "Ian Horrocks" <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: "W3C OWL Working Group" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0EF30CAA69519C4CB91D01481AEA06A001546849@judith.fzi.de>
Hi! Triggered by a mail of Holger (thanks to Holger for finding the "rdf:ObjectProperty" bug!), I have tried to bring the form of owl2.owl a bit more in line with the other files rdf.rdf and rdfs.rdfs (no changes to the relevant triples). Effects: * Slight changes to how the rdfs:commentS are written. * rdfs:seeAlso Links for each term. * A dc:title for the ontology header I have also checked through the comments and refined some of them, and most of them look now pretty acceptable to me, but a few seem still discussible. One thing that should probably be mentioned: I have extended the comment for owl:DataRange by a note that it is deprecated (exactly the same note that is used in the RDF-Based Semantics). Is someone unhappy with this? Cheers, Michael >-----Original Message----- >From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] >On Behalf Of Michael Schneider >Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 11:57 AM >To: Ian Horrocks >Cc: W3C OWL Working Group >Subject: RE: OWL dot OWL file > >Hi! > >I have created a Wiki page containing my current proposal for owl2.owl >(_not_ for the whole set OWL 2 axiomatic triples), so we can better work >on >it: > > <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Owl2DotOwlDevel> > >There are links to some of the mails so far, and a lot of open >questions, >and some TODOs. > >I have copy&pasted the ontology header from owl.owl, and started to >update >it, but there are several open points. In particular, the header comment >probably needs more brains to think about it. For a start, I have >included >some (not all :)) of Peter's yesterday's comments to it, but please... >comment! > >I have also added labels in the owl.owl style to every term, and even a >preliminary rdfs:comment (as recently asked for by Holger), but the >comments >are in several cases probably not so good yet, maybe even inadequate. >Maybe >others have a look at them (I will have a look myself, when I have a >little >more time for this). > >Cheers, >Michael -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider Research Scientist, Dept. Information Process Engineering (IPE) Tel : +49-721-9654-726 Fax : +49-721-9654-727 Email: michael.schneider@fzi.de WWW : http://www.fzi.de/michael.schneider ======================================================================= FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959 Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts, Az 14-0563.1, RP Karlsruhe Vorstand: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rüdiger Dillmann, Dipl. Wi.-Ing. Michael Flor, Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Wolffried Stucky, Prof. Dr. Rudi Studer Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus =======================================================================
Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 07:53:27 UTC