- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:52:06 +0100
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: 'W3C OWL Working Group' <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Bijan, Bijan Parsia wrote: > On 22 Jul 2009, at 17:01, Antoine Zimmermann wrote: > >> Dear working group fellows, >> >> I've been pointed to an issue wrt the XML schema of the OWL/XML syntax. >> First, the XSD file is enclosed by <pre> ... </pre> which breaks its >> validity. > > Yeah, a known problem. > >> Second, the example XML ontology in the spec [2] is not validated >> against the schema (without <pre> ... </pre>). > > It is valid, but there's another issue with the "live from wiki" > version...it entities all the ampersand, e.g., > > <!ENTITY PN_CHARS_U "&PN_CHARS_BASE;|_"> > > Which, obviously, breaks that use of entities. Thanks. Why can't we just edit the file at w3.org? The problem seems very easy to fix. > If you cut and paste the text of the schema as it's rendered in a > browser, it works fine and it validates the example. > > For your convenience, I've put a clean, working copy of the schema here: > http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~bparsia/owl/owlxml.xsd > and here's the spec example with schemaLocation pointing to the clean > schema: > http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~bparsia/owl/specExample.xml It works, but one validator [1] is still not happy with you input. [1] http://www.xmlme.com/Validator.aspx Regards, -- Antoine Zimmermann Post-doctoral researcher at: Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Galway IDA Business Park Lower Dangan Galway, Ireland antoine.zimmermann@deri.org http://vmgal34.deri.ie/~antzim/
Received on Wednesday, 22 July 2009 16:52:46 UTC