- From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:20:42 +0200
- To: "Ian Horrocks" <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: "W3C OWL Working Group" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0EF30CAA69519C4CB91D01481AEA06A0015465A6@judith.fzi.de>
Hi again! To be a little more explicit, here is my proposed list of triples for owl2.owl. NOT included is the ontology header, the labels per term, and the additional OWL 2 Full stuff. And it's not yet in RDF/XML. But the triples are better readable, anyway, IMHO. Cheers, Michael # =================== # === OWL CLASSES === # =================== owl:AllDifferent rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:AllDifferent rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource . owl:AllDisjointClasses rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:AllDisjointClasses rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource . owl:AllDisjointProperties rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:AllDisjointProperties rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource . owl:Annotation rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:Annotation rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource . owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:AnnotationProperty rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Property . owl:AsymmetricProperty rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:AsymmetricProperty rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Property . owl:Axiom rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:Axiom rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource . owl:Class rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:Class rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Class . owl:DataRange rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:DataRange rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Datatype . owl:DatatypeProperty rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:DatatypeProperty rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Property . owl:DeprecatedClass rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:DeprecatedClass rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Class . owl:DeprecatedProperty rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:DeprecatedProperty rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Property . owl:FunctionalProperty rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:FunctionalProperty rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Property . owl:InverseFunctionalProperty rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:InverseFunctionalProperty rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Property . owl:IrreflexiveProperty rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:IrreflexiveProperty rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Property . owl:NamedIndividual rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:NamedIndividual rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource . owl:NegativePropertyAssertion rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:NegativePropertyAssertion rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource . owl:Nothing rdf:type owl:Class . owl:Nothing rdfs:subClassOf owl:Thing . owl:ObjectProperty rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:ObjectProperty rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Property . owl:Ontology rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:Ontology rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource . owl:OntologyProperty rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:OntologyProperty rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Property . owl:ReflexiveProperty rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:ReflexiveProperty rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Property . owl:Restriction rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:Restriction rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Class . owl:SymmetricProperty rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:SymmetricProperty rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Property . owl:Thing rdf:type owl:Class . owl:TransitiveProperty rdf:type rdfs:Class . owl:TransitiveProperty rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Property . # ====================== # === OWL PROPERTIES === # ====================== owl:allValuesFrom rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:allValuesFrom rdfs:domain owl:Restriction . owl:allValuesFrom rdfs:range rdfs:Class . owl:annotatedProperty rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:annotatedProperty rdfs:domain rdfs:Resource . owl:annotatedProperty rdfs:range rdfs:Resource . owl:annotatedSource rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:annotatedSource rdfs:domain rdfs:Resource . owl:annotatedSource rdfs:range rdfs:Resource . owl:annotatedTarget rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:annotatedTarget rdfs:domain rdfs:Resource . owl:annotatedTarget rdfs:range rdfs:Resource . owl:assertionProperty rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:assertionProperty rdfs:domain owl:NegativePropertyAssertion . owl:assertionProperty rdfs:range rdf:Property . owl:backwardCompatibleWith rdf:type owl:OntologyProperty . owl:backwardCompatibleWith rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty . owl:backwardCompatibleWith rdfs:domain owl:Ontology . owl:backwardCompatibleWith rdfs:range owl:Ontology . owl:bottomDataProperty rdf:type owl:DatatypeProperty . owl:bottomDataProperty rdfs:domain owl:Thing . owl:bottomDataProperty rdfs:range rdfs:Literal . owl:bottomObjectProperty rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty . owl:bottomObjectProperty rdfs:domain owl:Thing . owl:bottomObjectProperty rdfs:range owl:Thing . owl:cardinality rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:cardinality rdfs:domain owl:Restriction . owl:cardinality rdfs:range xsd:nonNegativeInteger . rdfs:comment rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty . rdfs:comment rdfs:domain rdfs:Resource . rdfs:comment rdfs:range rdfs:Literal . owl:complementOf rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:complementOf rdfs:domain rdfs:Class . owl:complementOf rdfs:range rdfs:Class . owl:datatypeComplementOf rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:datatypeComplementOf rdfs:domain rdfs:Datatype . owl:datatypeComplementOf rdfs:range rdfs:Datatype . owl:deprecated rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty . owl:deprecated rdfs:domain rdfs:Resource . owl:deprecated rdfs:range rdfs:Resource . owl:differentFrom rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:differentFrom rdfs:domain rdfs:Resource . owl:differentFrom rdfs:range rdfs:Resource . owl:disjointUnionOf rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:disjointUnionOf rdfs:domain rdfs:Class . owl:disjointUnionOf rdfs:range rdf:List . owl:disjointWith rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:disjointWith rdfs:domain rdfs:Class . owl:disjointWith rdfs:range rdfs:Class . owl:distinctMembers rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:distinctMembers rdfs:domain owl:AllDifferent . owl:distinctMembers rdfs:range rdf:List . owl:equivalentClass rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:equivalentClass rdfs:domain rdfs:Class . owl:equivalentClass rdfs:range rdfs:Class . owl:equivalentProperty rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:equivalentProperty rdfs:domain rdf:Property . owl:equivalentProperty rdfs:range rdf:Property . owl:hasKey rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:hasKey rdfs:domain rdfs:Class . owl:hasKey rdfs:range rdf:List . owl:hasSelf rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:hasSelf rdfs:domain owl:Restriction . owl:hasSelf rdfs:range rdfs:Resource . owl:hasValue rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:hasValue rdfs:domain owl:Restriction . owl:hasValue rdfs:range rdfs:Resource . owl:imports rdf:type owl:OntologyProperty . owl:imports rdfs:domain owl:Ontology . owl:imports rdfs:range owl:Ontology . owl:incompatibleWith rdf:type owl:OntologyProperty . owl:incompatibleWith rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty . owl:incompatibleWith rdfs:domain owl:Ontology . owl:incompatibleWith rdfs:range owl:Ontology . owl:intersectionOf rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:intersectionOf rdfs:domain rdfs:Class . owl:intersectionOf rdfs:range rdf:List . owl:inverseOf rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:inverseOf rdfs:domain rdf:Property . owl:inverseOf rdfs:range rdf:Property . rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty . rdfs:isDefinedBy rdfs:domain rdfs:Resource . rdfs:isDefinedBy rdfs:range rdfs:Resource . rdfs:label rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty . rdfs:label rdfs:domain rdfs:Resource . rdfs:label rdfs:range rdfs:Literal . owl:maxCardinality rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:maxCardinality rdfs:domain owl:Restriction . owl:maxCardinality rdfs:range xsd:nonNegativeInteger . owl:maxQualifiedCardinality rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:maxQualifiedCardinality rdfs:domain owl:Restriction . owl:maxQualifiedCardinality rdfs:range xsd:nonNegativeInteger . owl:members rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:members rdfs:domain rdfs:Resource . owl:members rdfs:range rdf:List . owl:minCardinality rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:minCardinality rdfs:domain owl:Restriction . owl:minCardinality rdfs:range xsd:nonNegativeInteger . owl:minQualifiedCardinality rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:minQualifiedCardinality rdfs:domain owl:Restriction . owl:minQualifiedCardinality rdfs:range xsd:nonNegativeInteger . owl:onClass rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:onClass rdfs:domain owl:Restriction . owl:onClass rdfs:range rdfs:Class . owl:onDataRange rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:onDataRange rdfs:domain owl:Restriction . owl:onDataRange rdfs:range rdfs:Datatype . owl:onDatatype rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:onDatatype rdfs:domain rdfs:Datatype . owl:onDatatype rdfs:range rdfs:Datatype . owl:oneOf rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:oneOf rdfs:domain rdfs:Class . owl:oneOf rdfs:range rdf:List . owl:onProperty rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:onProperty rdfs:domain owl:Restriction . owl:onProperty rdfs:range rdf:Property . owl:onProperties rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:onProperties rdfs:domain owl:Restriction . owl:onProperties rdfs:range rdf:List . owl:priorVersion rdf:type owl:OntologyProperty . owl:priorVersion rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty . owl:priorVersion rdfs:domain owl:Ontology . owl:priorVersion rdfs:range owl:Ontology . owl:propertyChainAxiom rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:propertyChainAxiom rdfs:domain rdf:Property . owl:propertyChainAxiom rdfs:range rdf:List . owl:propertyDisjointWith rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:propertyDisjointWith rdfs:domain rdf:Property . owl:propertyDisjointWith rdfs:range rdf:Property . owl:qualifiedCardinality rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:qualifiedCardinality rdfs:domain owl:Restriction . owl:qualifiedCardinality rdfs:range xsd:nonNegativeInteger . owl:sameAs rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:sameAs rdfs:domain rdfs:Resource . owl:sameAs rdfs:range rdfs:Resource . rdfs:seeAlso rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty . rdfs:seeAlso rdfs:domain rdfs:Resource . rdfs:seeAlso rdfs:range rdfs:Resource . owl:someValuesFrom rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:someValuesFrom rdfs:domain owl:Restriction . owl:someValuesFrom rdfs:range rdfs:Class . owl:sourceIndividual rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:sourceIndividual rdfs:domain owl:NegativePropertyAssertion . owl:sourceIndividual rdfs:range rdfs:Resource . owl:targetIndividual rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:targetIndividual rdfs:domain owl:NegativePropertyAssertion . owl:targetIndividual rdfs:range rdfs:Resource . owl:targetValue rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:targetValue rdfs:domain owl:NegativePropertyAssertion . owl:targetValue rdfs:range rdfs:Literal . owl:topDataProperty rdf:type owl:DatatypeProperty . owl:topDataProperty rdfs:domain owl:Thing . owl:topDataProperty rdfs:range rdfs:Literal . owl:topObjectProperty rdf:type rdf:ObjectProperty . owl:topObjectProperty rdfs:domain owl:Thing . owl:topObjectProperty rdfs:range owl:Thing . owl:unionOf rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:unionOf rdfs:domain rdfs:Class . owl:unionOf rdfs:range rdf:List . owl:versionInfo rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty . owl:versionInfo rdfs:domain rdfs:Resource . owl:versionInfo rdfs:range rdfs:Resource . owl:versionIRI rdf:type owl:OntologyProperty . owl:versionIRI rdfs:domain owl:Ontology . owl:versionIRI rdfs:range owl:Ontology . owl:withRestrictions rdf:type rdf:Property . owl:withRestrictions rdfs:domain rdfs:Datatype . owl:withRestrictions rdfs:range rdf:List . >-----Original Message----- >From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] >On Behalf Of Michael Schneider >Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 12:33 PM >To: Ian Horrocks >Cc: W3C OWL Working Group >Subject: RE: OWL dot OWL file > >Hi! > >A few days ago I have started working on my list of axiomatic triples >for >the RDF-Based Semantics, but then decided to additionally work on >owl(2).owl, at least to see whether some reasonable >alignment/relationship >is possible. So I have analyzed owl.owl for its common and specific >features, see below for the result (boring list, I know, but better than >trying to understand owl.owl from scratch, I guess. :)) Based on this >analysis, I have created a proposal on (a) how an owl2.owl could look >like, >and (b) how this would be related to my axiomatic triples. See below! > >Comments welcome! > >Cheers, >Michael > >== Analysis of owl.owl == > >These are the different features of owl.owl: > >0) General: >0.1) Ontology Header >0.1.1) imports RDFS ontology >0.1.2) builds rdfs:isDefinedBy relations to OWL Semantics spec, the OWL >testcases, and the OWL Features. >0.1.3) States in a comment that importing this ontology will render >ontology >to be OWL Full. >0.1.4) Has owl:versionInfo with date of recommendation (2004-02-10). >0.2) There is a rdfs:label for every definition of an OWL term. > >1) Covered Vocabulary Terms: >1.1) Provides schema definitions for all vocabulary terms in the OWL >namespace (classes and properties). >1.2) _No_ re-definitions for RDF/RDFS vocabulary terms. >1.3) _No_ definitions for the mandatory datatypes of OWL (xsd:string, >xsd:integer). > >2) Expressed Semantic Relationships: >2.1) Definition for classes: >2.1.1) always provides rdf:type axiom: generally rdfs:Class, but >owl:Class >of owl:Nothing, owl:Thing >2.1.2) generally provides rdfs:subClassOf axiom to upper class. >2.1.2.1) The subclass axiom is omitted whenever sub class of >rdfs:Resource. >2.2.2.2) The super class of the "syntactic category" owl:Class is >rdfs:Class. >2.2.2.3) _No_ explicit superclass is defined for owl:DataRange. >2.2.2.4) The super class of owl:ObjectProperty, owl:DatatypeProperty, >owl:OntologyProperty and owl:AnnotationProperty is rdf:Property. >2.2.2.5) The superclass of owl:FunctionalProperty is rdf:Property, while >for >owl:SymmetricProperty it is owl:ObjectProperty. >2.1.3) special: definition of owl:Nothing and owl:Thing use OWL terms >owl:complementOf and owl:unionOf to express additional semantics >2.2) For properties: >2.2.1) always provides rdf:type axiom: generally rdf:Property, but also >owl:AnnotationProperty and owl:OntologyProperty. >2.2.1.1) For ontology properties, the typing triple for >owl:OntologyProperty >is in addition to rdf:Property. >2.2.1.2) Only for owl:versionInfo there is an additional typing triple >for >owl:AnnotationProperty in *addition* to rdf:Property (elsewhere there is >only a typing triple for owl:AnnotationProperty). >2.2.2) generally provides rdfs:domain and rdfs:range axioms. >2.2.2.1) The range (domain) axiom is omitted whenever the range (or >domain) >is rdfs:Resource. >2.2.2.2) If the domain or range is the class of classes, then it is >sometimes it is rdfs:Class (e.g. owl:someValuesFrom), and sometimes it >is >owl:Class (e.g. owl:disjointWith). >2.2.2.3) If the domain or range is the class of properties, then it is >alway >rdf:Property, never owl:ObjectProperty (e.g. owl:onProperty). >2.2.2.4) For ontology properties the domain and range are both >owl:Ontology. >2.2.2.5) For multi-argument constructs s.a. owl:unionOf the range is >rdf:List. >2.2.3) special: owl:equivalentClass specified as sub property of >rdfs:subClassOf. analog for owl:equivalentProperty. > >3) Missing OWL Full Semantic Relationships: >3.1) _No_ equivalences are defined for: >3.1.1) owl:Thing and rdfs:Resource >3.1.2) owl:Class and rdfs:Class (but the former is explicitly defined to >be >a subclass of the latter) >3.1.3) owl:ObjectProperty and rdf:Property (but the former is explicitly >defined to be a subclass of the latter) >3.2) _No_ additional hierarchy relationships are defined for: >3.2.1) owl:DatatypeProperty and owl:ObjectProperty >3.2.2) owl:OntologyProperty and owl:ObjectProperty >3.2.3) owl:AnnotationProperty and owl:ObjectProperty >3.2.4) owl:DataRange and owl:Class > >== Discussion == > >For owl2.owl: > >I believe we should be more consequently go for a "clean" RDF Schema. >There >are a few strange things happening in owl.owl that I think should be >changed/dropped: > >* The use of OWL axioms (owl:complementOf, (2.1.3)) to "define" >owl:Thing >and owl:Nothing. In fact, the OWL terms used there are highly >underspecified >and do not really define what they are intended to define. Also, there >are >only very few uses of this, why not elsewhere? Why at all? >* Similar, terms s.a. owl:equivalentClass should not be "defined" with >other >terms via a sub property relationship (2.2.3). >* I would propose to keep with RDFS terms as often as possible. For >example, >there are cases where the super class or domain/range of some defined >OWL >class term is owl:Class, and other cases where it is rdfs:Class. Most of >these terms are not really owl:Classes, so I would suggest to generally >use >rdfs:Class. The only exception is owl:Thing, owl:Nothing, >(top|bottom)(Object|Data)Property, and the annotation properties, since >these are "real" classes and properties even in DL. > >Beyond the RDFS-ishness that cannot be avoided, there shouldn't be any >additional Full-ishnesses like the equivalence of owl:Class with >rdfs:Class. >This would then just be as in owl.owl (3). But maybe someone else has >another opinion? > >owl.owl omits the treatment datatypes, and this is probably a reasonable >idea in our case as well, given that we have >30 of them. :) > >Maybe, for completeness, we should always give the full specification >with >datatype and subclass for classes, and with type, domain and range for >properties, even if the type, domain or range is rdfs:Resource? It's >often >omitted in owl.owl, which I found more confusing then helpful. > >What I have in mind will be slightly incompatible with owl.owl, but will >make things more regular (while there's semantically no difference). And >I >don't think that strict compatibility with owl.owl is an issue here. > >Ok, here is my proposal, for both owl2.owl and the axiomatic triples in >the >RDF-Based Semantics: > >== Proposal == > >=== owl2.owl === > >* We reuse/update the content of the ontology header (0.1), but we need >to >think a bit about the references made by rdfs:isDefinedBy statements. > >* We use labels for each definitions, as in (0.2). > >* There will only be definitions for the OWL 2 vocabulary, i.e. >** no repetitions of RDF(S) vocabulary (1.2) >*** exception: the RDFS annotation properties, since they need to be >defined >as annotation properties >** no definitions for datatypes, not even from the OWL namespace (1.3) >** no definitions for facets > >* Classes will generally have type rdfs:Class, and a subclass, being one >of >the RDF(S) classes. >** Exceptions: owl:Thing, owl:Nothing >*** Type is owl:Class >*** Superclass of owl:Nothing is owl:Thing >*** No superclass is given for owl:Thing > >* Properties will generally have type rdf:Property, and domain and range >being one of the RDF(S) classes. >** Exceptions: (top|bottom)(Object|Data)Property >*** Type of (top|bottom)ObjectProperty is owl:ObjectProperty. >*** Type of (top|bottom)DataProperty is owl:DatatypeProperty. >*** Domain of (top|bottom)(Object|Data)Property is owl:Thing. >*** Range of (top|bottom)ObjectProperty is owl:Thing . >*** Range of (top|bottom)DataProperty is rdfs:Literal . >** Exception: Property restriction vocabulary terms have domain >owl:Restriction (as in owl.owl). >** Exception: Multi-argument constructs, such as owl:unionOf, have range >rdf:List (as in owl.owl). >** Exception: Ontology properties have type owl:OntologyProperty, and >domain/range owl:Ontology (as in owl.owl). >*** we omit the additional (redundant) rdf:type rdf:Property triple. >** Exception: Annotation properties have type owl:AnnotationProperty (as >in >owl.owl). > >* No kind of axioms beyond this schema: >** no "pseudo" OWL axioms, deviating from owl.owl (2.1.3) >** no definition of OWL properties in terms of RDF(S) properties, >deviating >from owl.owl (2.2.3) >** no OWL Full equivalences, following owl.owl (3.1) >** no OWL Full hierarchy relationships, following owl.owl (3.2) > >=== Axiomatic Triples in the RDF-Based Semantics === > >Differences to owl.owl: > >* There will be no use of RDF/XML, but single triples are written, as >throughout the document. >* There will be no ontology header, only the relevant axiomatic triples. >* There will be no labels. >* There will be additional triples for the "missing OWL Full Semantics >Relationships" (3). >* There will be additional typing and subclass triples for the datatypes >of >OWL 2 (1.3). >* There will be additional typing and domain/range triples for the >facets of >OWL 2. > >The additional stuff will be separated editorially in a form that allows >for >easy selection of the owl2.owl part by copy and paste, for those who >care. > >=== END === > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg- >request@w3.org] >>On Behalf Of Ian Horrocks >>Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 7:47 AM >>To: W3C OWL Working Group >>Subject: OWL dot OWL file >> >>I believe that what we were referring to in our discussion last week, >>and what Holger is asking for [1], is what in OWL 1 was called the >>"RDF Schema of OWL" [2]. As is explained in Section 1.7 [3]: >> >>"This schema provides information about the OWL vocabulary that could >>be a useful reference point for ontology builders and tool >>developers. The restrictions provided by the schema on the OWL >>classes and properties are informative and not complete. Also, this >>schema does not make distinctions between OWL Full, OWL DL and OWL >>Lite." >> >>The idea is to use RDFS to describe the structure of OWL syntax -- >>i.e., it aims to be a kind of "meta-schema". For example, it >>specifies the range and domain of the properties used in the OWL >>syntax. Unfortunately, RDFS isn't even close to being capable of >>describing the structure completely, so the schema is highly >>incomplete, and so of limited utility. However, I don't immediately >>see the harm in updating it slightly for OWL 2 given that we have had >>more than one request. I believe that this is what was proposed by >>several people during the teleconf. Presumably we would arrange for >>this updated version to be served from [4]? >> >>Note that this shouldn't be confused with Michael's suggestion to >>augment the RDF-based semantics with a set of axiomatic triples >>(which is, IMHO, a reasonable but completely unrelated proposal). >> >>Regards, >>Ian >> >>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jul/ >>0007.html >>[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#appB >>[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#AppendixList >>[4] http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl# > >-- >Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider >Research Scientist, Dept. Information Process Engineering (IPE) >Tel : +49-721-9654-726 >Fax : +49-721-9654-727 >Email: michael.schneider@fzi.de >WWW : http://www.fzi.de/michael.schneider >======================================================================= >FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe >Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe >Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959 >Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts, Az 14-0563.1, RP Karlsruhe >Vorstand: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rüdiger Dillmann, Dipl. Wi.-Ing. Michael Flor, >Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Wolffried Stucky, Prof. Dr. Rudi Studer >Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus >=======================================================================
Received on Tuesday, 21 July 2009 12:21:25 UTC